|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|17-1676||Ala. Crim. App.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2018|
Issue: Whether the Alabama courts’ decision to permit the introduction of written “reports” to law enforcement, regarding blood alcohol tests, into evidence for the truth of the matters asserted therein — despite the lack of testimony from the person who performed the test and signed the report, or any witness who personally involved in the testing of the blood samples in question — is contrary to Bullcoming v. New Mexico.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jun 14 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 18, 2018)|
|Jul 02 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 18, 2018 to August 17, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jul 10 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 17, 2018.|
|Aug 08 2018||Brief of respondent State of Alabama in opposition filed.|
|Aug 20 2018||Reply of petitioner Vanessa Stuart filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 22 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.|
|Sep 18 2018||Record Requested.|
|Sep 24 2018||Record received from the Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama. The record is electronic.|
|Sep 26 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/12/2018.|
|Oct 10 2018||Rescheduled.|
|Oct 22 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.|
|Oct 29 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/2/2018.|
|Nov 05 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2018.|
|Nov 13 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/16/2018.|
|Nov 19 2018||Petition DENIED. Justice Gorsuch, with whom Justice Sotomayor joins, dissenting from the denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion)|
Just in: The next Supreme Court opinion day will be next Monday. The court expects to release one or more opinions in argued cases from the current term.
End of an era: Here is NBC News prez Noah Oppenheim's memo about Pete Williams' plan to retire this summer
The Supreme Court sides with Sen. Ted Cruz in his First Amendment challenge to a federal campaign-finance law that limits how and when candidates can recoup loans that they make to their own campaigns. The vote is 6-3 along ideological lines.
In an immigration case, SCOTUS rules 5-4 that federal courts do NOT have jurisdiction to review certain executive-branch factual findings that determine whether non-citizens are eligible for "adjustment of status." Those findings can dictate whether a person is deported.
SCOTUS agrees to take up two new cases: Jones v. Hendrix (a habeas corpus case) and SEC v. Cochran (a case about the power of district courts to hear challenges to the constitutionality of the SEC's administrative law proceedings). Full order list here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/051622zor_hgcj.pdf
We're live now on SCOTUSblog's homepage or at https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/
Today at SCOTUS: The court will issue one or more opinions in argued cases at 10 a.m. EDT. But first, orders on pending petitions at 9:30. We'll fire up our live blog at 9:25 to break it all down and answer your questions. Grab some ☕️ and come join us: https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/