Sheetz v. County of El Dorado, California
| Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22-1074 | Cal. Ct. App. | Jan 9, 2024 | Apr 12, 2024 | 9-0 | Barrett | OT 2023 | 
Holding: The Fifth Amendment's takings clause does not distinguish between legislative and administrative land-use permit conditions.
Judgment: Vacated and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Barrett on April 12, 2024. Justice Sotomayor filed a concurring opinion, in which Justice Jackson joined. Justice Gorsuch filed a concurring opinion. Justice Kavanaugh filed a concurring opinion, in which Justices Kagan and Jackson joined.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Court rules for property owner in building fee dispute (Amy Howe, April 12, 2024)
 - Court split over California man's takings clause dispute (Amy Howe, January 10, 2024)
 - Government power, from federal agencies to counties, highlights January session (Ellena Erskine, January 9, 2024)
 - Latest property rights fight comes before justices (Amy Howe, January 5, 2024)
 - Justices schedule major cases on deference to federal agencies (Amy Howe, November 17, 2023)
 - Twelve cases added to Supreme Court calendar (Amy Howe, September 29, 2023)
 - Outspoken critic on Texas city council seeks to revive lawsuit over retaliatory arrest (Kalvis Golde, June 12, 2023)