|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-824||3rd Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Issues: (1) Whether the Second Amendment protects the right to carry a firearm outside the home for self-defense; and (2) whether the government may deny categorically the exercise of the right to carry a firearm outside the home to typical law-abiding citizens by conditioning the exercise of the right on a showing of a special need to carry a firearm.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Dec 20 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 1, 2019)|
|Jan 04 2019||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioners, Thomas Rogers, et al.|
|Jan 18 2019||Brief amici curiae of Attorney's General of Arizona, et al. filed.|
|Jan 24 2019||Blanket Consent filed by Respondents, Gurbir Grewal, et al.|
|Jan 28 2019||Waiver of right of respondents Gurbir Grewal, et al. to respond filed.|
|Jan 29 2019||Waiver of right of respondent Kenneth J. Brown, Jr. to respond filed.|
|Jan 31 2019||Brief amicus curiae of National African American Gun Association, Inc. filed.|
|Feb 01 2019||Brief amici curiae of Law Enforcement Groups et al. filed.|
|Feb 01 2019||Brief amicus curiae of American Civil Rights Union filed.|
|Feb 01 2019||Brief amici curiae of Coalition of New Jersey Firearms Owners, et al. filed.|
|Feb 01 2019||Brief amicus curiae of National Rifle Association of America, Inc. filed.|
|Feb 06 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019.|
|Feb 19 2019||Response Requested. (Due March 21, 2019)|
|Mar 12 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 21, 2019 to April 19, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Mar 15 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 19, 2019, for all respondents.|
|Apr 19 2019||Brief of respondents Gurbir Grewal, et al. in opposition filed.|
|May 03 2019||Reply of petitioners Thomas Rogers, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|May 07 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2019.|
|Apr 27 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/1/2020.|
|Apr 29 2020||Supplemental brief of petitioners Thomas Rogers, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|May 11 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.|
|May 18 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2020.|
|May 22 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/28/2020.|
|Jun 01 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.|
|Jun 08 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/11/2020.|
|Jun 15 2020||Petition DENIED. Justice Thomas, with whom Justice Kavanaugh joins as to all but Part II, dissenting from the denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion)|
Tomorrow morning the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a pair of voting rights cases involving Section 2 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, which prohibits policies or laws that result in racial discrimination in voting.
Missed the morning orders? @AHoweBlogger's got you covered. Read about the new grants including a review of Puerto Rico’s eligibility for a federal benefits program. Plus, she's got an overview of several high-profile petitions still under consideration.
Court will review Puerto Rico’s eligibility for federal benefits program - SCOTUSblog
The court on Monday morning issued orders from the justices’ private conference on Friday, Feb. 26. The justic...
NEW: SCOTUS agrees to take up two new cases. Here's the orders list. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/030121zor_m6hn.pdf
#SCOTUS grants US v. Vaello-Madero, a challenge to exclusion of Puerto Rico residents from eligibility for Supplemental Social Security Income program, which provides benefits to poor disabled adults & children
Good morning. It’s Monday, and it’s March!
At 9:30 a.m. EST, SCOTUS will release orders from Friday’s conference.
At 10:00, the court will consider an appointments clause challenge to administrative patent judges. More from George Quillin & Jeanne Gills.
Justices to consider appointments clause challenge to administrative patent judges - SCOTUSblog
The justices continue their light load for the February argument session next week. First up is Monday’s Unite...
BREAKING: SCOTUS orders California’s Santa Clara County to allow churches to hold indoor services. Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan dissent. Here’s the short shadow docket order.
#SCOTUS grants emergency request from northern California churches to allow indoor worship services pending appeal, says result is "clearly dictated" by recent decision. Kagan dissents, joined by Breyer & Sotomayor: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/022621zr_1bo2.pdf
Just in: SCOTUS opinions expected next Thursday.
#SCOTUS website indicates that the Court will release orders from today's conference on Monday morning, March 1, at 9:30 am, with opinions again on Thursday, March 4, at 10 am. Justices will also hear oral arguments next week, including in Arizona voting dispute on Tuesday.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.