|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-824||3rd Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Issues: (1) Whether the Second Amendment protects the right to carry a firearm outside the home for self-defense; and (2) whether the government may deny categorically the exercise of the right to carry a firearm outside the home to typical law-abiding citizens by conditioning the exercise of the right on a showing of a special need to carry a firearm.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Dec 20 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 1, 2019)|
|Jan 04 2019||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioners, Thomas Rogers, et al.|
|Jan 18 2019||Brief amici curiae of Attorney's General of Arizona, et al. filed.|
|Jan 24 2019||Blanket Consent filed by Respondents, Gurbir Grewal, et al.|
|Jan 28 2019||Waiver of right of respondents Gurbir Grewal, et al. to respond filed.|
|Jan 29 2019||Waiver of right of respondent Kenneth J. Brown, Jr. to respond filed.|
|Jan 31 2019||Brief amicus curiae of National African American Gun Association, Inc. filed.|
|Feb 01 2019||Brief amici curiae of Law Enforcement Groups et al. filed.|
|Feb 01 2019||Brief amicus curiae of American Civil Rights Union filed.|
|Feb 01 2019||Brief amici curiae of Coalition of New Jersey Firearms Owners, et al. filed.|
|Feb 01 2019||Brief amicus curiae of National Rifle Association of America, Inc. filed.|
|Feb 06 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019.|
|Feb 19 2019||Response Requested. (Due March 21, 2019)|
|Mar 12 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 21, 2019 to April 19, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Mar 15 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 19, 2019, for all respondents.|
|Apr 19 2019||Brief of respondents Gurbir Grewal, et al. in opposition filed.|
|May 03 2019||Reply of petitioners Thomas Rogers, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|May 07 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2019.|
|Apr 27 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/1/2020.|
|Apr 29 2020||Supplemental brief of petitioners Thomas Rogers, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|May 11 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.|
|May 18 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2020.|
|May 22 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/28/2020.|
|Jun 01 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.|
|Jun 08 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/11/2020.|
|Jun 15 2020||Petition DENIED. Justice Thomas, with whom Justice Kavanaugh joins as to all but Part II, dissenting from the denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion)|
JUST IN: The Supreme Court agrees to take up five new cases, including an appeal from a high school football coach who lost his job after he prayed on the field.
#SCOTUS will have more opinions next Thursday at 10 am.
A workplace vaccine-or-test requirement that would have covered 84 million workers -- blocked. A vaccine mandate for over 10 million health care workers -- allowed to take effect.
Full analysis from @AHoweBlogger on this afternoon's rulings:
Fractured court blocks vaccine-or-test requirement for large workplaces but green-lights vaccine mandate for health care workers - SCOTUSblog
With COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations reaching a new record high as a result of the Omicron variant, the Suprem...
Here's a two-minute explainer from @katieleebarlow, SCOTUSblog's TikTokker-in-residence, on the pair of vaccine decisions the court just handed down.
BREAKING: The Supreme Court BLOCKS the federal government's COVID-19 vaccine-or-test requirement for large workplaces. The court ALLOWS a vaccine mandate for workers at federally funded health care facilities to take effect nationwide.
SCOTUS releases just one opinion today: an 8-1 decision on an arcane question of pension payments for "dual-status military technicians." The court rules in favor of the government's statutory interpretation and against the technicians. Barrett has the opinion; Gorsuch dissents.