|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-824||3rd Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Issues: (1) Whether the Second Amendment protects the right to carry a firearm outside the home for self-defense; and (2) whether the government may deny categorically the exercise of the right to carry a firearm outside the home to typical law-abiding citizens by conditioning the exercise of the right on a showing of a special need to carry a firearm.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Dec 20 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 1, 2019)|
|Jan 04 2019||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioners, Thomas Rogers, et al.|
|Jan 18 2019||Brief amici curiae of Attorney's General of Arizona, et al. filed.|
|Jan 24 2019||Blanket Consent filed by Respondents, Gurbir Grewal, et al.|
|Jan 28 2019||Waiver of right of respondents Gurbir Grewal, et al. to respond filed.|
|Jan 29 2019||Waiver of right of respondent Kenneth J. Brown, Jr. to respond filed.|
|Jan 31 2019||Brief amicus curiae of National African American Gun Association, Inc. filed.|
|Feb 01 2019||Brief amici curiae of Law Enforcement Groups et al. filed.|
|Feb 01 2019||Brief amicus curiae of American Civil Rights Union filed.|
|Feb 01 2019||Brief amici curiae of Coalition of New Jersey Firearms Owners, et al. filed.|
|Feb 01 2019||Brief amicus curiae of National Rifle Association of America, Inc. filed.|
|Feb 06 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019.|
|Feb 19 2019||Response Requested. (Due March 21, 2019)|
|Mar 12 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 21, 2019 to April 19, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Mar 15 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 19, 2019, for all respondents.|
|Apr 19 2019||Brief of respondents Gurbir Grewal, et al. in opposition filed.|
|May 03 2019||Reply of petitioners Thomas Rogers, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|May 07 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2019.|
|Apr 27 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/1/2020.|
|Apr 29 2020||Supplemental brief of petitioners Thomas Rogers, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|May 11 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.|
|May 18 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2020.|
|May 22 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/28/2020.|
|Jun 01 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.|
|Jun 08 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/11/2020.|
|Jun 15 2020||Petition DENIED. Justice Thomas, with whom Justice Kavanaugh joins as to all but Part II, dissenting from the denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion)|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.