Richards v. Ernst & Young, LLP
Petition for certiorari denied on October 14, 2014
Issue: Whether a party should be required to demonstrate prejudice after the opposing party waived its contractual right to arbitrate by participating in litigation, in order for such waiver to be binding and irrevocable under Section 3 of the Federal Arbitration Act; (2) whether, if prejudice is required, what constitutes sufficient "prejudice" in order to find "waiver;" and (3) whether state law contractual defenses to enforcement of an arbitration agreement preserved under Section 2 of the Act, such as defenses of waiver or estoppel, provide a defense to an application for either a stay under Section 3 of the Act or an order compelling arbitration under Section 4.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petition of the day (Maureen Johnston, July 2, 2014)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
04/21/2014 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 23, 2014) |
05/09/2014 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including June 23, 2014. |
06/23/2014 | Brief of respondent Ernst & Young, LLP in opposition filed. |
07/07/2014 | Reply of petitioner Michelle Richards filed. (Distributed) |
07/09/2014 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 29, 2014. |
10/06/2014 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 10, 2014. |
10/14/2014 | Petition DENIED. |