|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-337||Fed. Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.
Issue: Whether the inter partes review proceedings brought by private respondents against the University of Minnesota in this case are barred by sovereign immunity.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Sep 12 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 15, 2019)|
|Sep 17 2019||Motion of respondent Gilead Sciences, Inc. to extend the time to file a response from October 15, 2019 to November 14, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Sep 19 2019||Motion of respondents Ericsson Inc., et al. to extend the time to file a response from October 15, 2019 to November 14, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Sep 20 2019||The motions to extend the time to file responses to the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted and the time is extended to and including November 14, 2019, for all respondents.|
|Oct 04 2019||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Regents of the University of Minnesota.|
|Oct 11 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Association of Public and Land-grant Universities filed.|
|Oct 15 2019||Brief amici curiae of State of Indiana et al. filed.|
|Oct 15 2019||Brief amici curiae of Twelve State Universities and State University Systems filed.|
|Oct 24 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 14, 2019 to December 5, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Oct 25 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including December 5, 2019, for all respondents.|
|Dec 05 2019||Brief of respondents LSI Corporation and Avago Technologies U.S. Inc.,et al. in opposition filed.|
|Dec 05 2019||Brief of respondent Gilead Sciences, Inc. in opposition filed.|
|Dec 05 2019||Brief of respondents Ericsson Inc. and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson in opposition filed.|
|Dec 18 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.|
|Dec 18 2019||Reply of petitioner Regents of the University of Minnesota filed.|
|Jan 13 2020||Petition DENIED.|
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
We're so excited about our April 15 Live Webinar (w/ @HarvardACS & @HarvardFedSoc), Covering the Court, featuring an all-star lineup of panelists @jduffyrice, @katieleebarlow, @whignewtons, & @stevenmazie! _👩⚖️👩⚖️👩⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️_ Register here ➡️ https://harvard.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_k_b_9IPBQ_GV37rpsjF9kw
Senator Markey (D-Ma) is delivering remarks right now in front of the Supreme Court introducing the Judiciary Act of 2021 to expand the court to 13 justices. He’s flanked by Chairman of House Judiciary, Jerry Nadler (D-NY), and Hank Johnson (D-Ga).
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here:
Cast your vote below!
The “great chief” and the “super chief”: A final showdown in Supreme Court March Madness - SCOTUSblog
Forget Ali vs. Frazier, Celtics vs. Lakers, or Evert vs. Navratilova. It’s time for Marshall vs. Warren. After...
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.