|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|17-778||6th Cir.||Apr 24, 2019||Jun 10, 2019||9-0||Kavanaugh||OT 2018|
Disclosure: Vinson & Elkins LLP, whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.
Holding: Michigan’s third-degree home-invasion statute substantially corresponds to or is narrower than generic burglary for purposes of qualifying for enhanced sentencing under the Armed Career Criminal Act.
Judgment: Affirmed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Kavanaugh on June 10, 2019. Justice Thomas filed a concurring opinion.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Sep 13 2017||Application (17A296) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 26, 2017 to November 24, 2017, submitted to Justice Kagan.|
|Sep 15 2017||Application (17A296) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until November 24, 2017.|
|Nov 24 2017||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 28, 2017)|
|Dec 19 2017||Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 28, 2017 to January 29, 2017, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Dec 20 2017||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 29, 2018.|
|Dec 28 2017||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed.|
|Jan 17 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 29, 2018 to February 28, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jan 18 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 28, 2018.|
|Feb 22 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 28, 2018 to March 30, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Feb 23 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including March 30, 2018.|
|Mar 30 2018||Brief of respondent United States of America filed.|
|Apr 06 2018||Waiver of the 14-day waiting period under Rule 15.5 filed by petitioner.|
|Apr 10 2018||Reply of petitioner Jamar Quarles filed.|
|Apr 11 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/27/2018.|
|Dec 13 2018||Supplemental brief of petitioner Jamar Quarles filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 20 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.|
|Jan 07 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/11/2019.|
|Jan 11 2019||Petition GRANTED.|
|Feb 11 2019||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, April 24, 2019|
|Feb 20 2019||Joint appendix filed.|
|Feb 20 2019||Brief of petitioner Jamar Quarles filed.|
|Feb 27 2019||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed.|
|Feb 27 2019||Brief amici curiae of Federal Public Defenders for the Northern, Western, and Southern Districts of Texas filed.|
|Mar 20 2019||CIRCULATED|
|Mar 20 2019||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 6th Circuit.|
|Mar 20 2019||Record received from the U.S.C.A. 6th Circuit is electronic.|
|Mar 22 2019||Brief of respondent United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 15 2019||Reply of petitioner Jamar Quarles filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 24 2019||Argued. For petitioner: Jeremy C. Marwell, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Zachary D. Tripp, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.|
|Jun 10 2019||Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Kavanaugh, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Thomas, J., filed a concurring opinion.|
|Jul 12 2019||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
Today at the court:
A nuts-and-bolts question of civil procedure. After an appeal is decided, do courts have discretion to limit the administrative “costs” that the prevailing party can recover from the losing party?
Argument begins at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Justices to consider awards of costs of appellate litigation - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in City of San Antonio v. Hotels.com brings the justices a basic nuts-and-bolts question of...
In 2019, the Supreme Court limited the scope of a federal law that bans people convicted of felonies from having a gun. Up this morning at the court: back-to-back cases that will decide how many felon-in-possession convictions will need new trials or pleas under that 2019 ruling.
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.