|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|17-1056||9th Cir.||TBD||TBD||TBD||TBD||OT 2018|
Issue: Whether, or in what circumstances, a defendant must admit that non-forward-looking statements are false or misleading, in order to be protected by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act safe-harbor provision for forward-looking statements.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Dec 01 2017||Application (17A601) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 28, 2017 to January 26, 2018, submitted to Justice Kennedy.|
|Dec 05 2017||Application (17A601) granted by Justice Kennedy extending the time to file until January 26, 2018.|
|Jan 26 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 26, 2018)|
|Feb 08 2018||Waiver of right of respondent City of Miami Fire Fighters’ and Police Officers’ Retirement Trust, et al. to respond filed.|
|Feb 09 2018||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioners, Quality Systems, Inc., et al..|
|Feb 14 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/2/2018.|
|Feb 14 2018||Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, City of Miami Fire Fighters’ and Police Officers’ Retirement Trust, et al.|
|Feb 20 2018||Response Requested. (Due March 22, 2018)|
|Mar 22 2018||Brief of respondents City of Miami Fire Fighters’ and Police Officers’ Retirement Trust, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Mar 22 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed.|
|Mar 22 2018||Brief amici curiae of Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, et al. filed.|
|Apr 10 2018||Reply of petitioners Quality Systems, Inc., et al. filed.|
|Apr 11 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/27/2018.|
|May 07 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/10/2018.|
|May 11 2018||Letter of May 11, 2018 from counsel for petitioners received. (Distributed)|
|May 14 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/17/2018.|
|May 21 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/24/2018.|
|May 29 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/31/2018.|
|Jun 04 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/7/2018.|
|Jun 08 2018||Letter of June 8, 2018 from counsel for petitioners received. (Distributed)|
|Jun 11 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/14/2018.|
|Jun 18 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/21/2018.|
|Jun 27 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/27/2018.|
|Sep 14 2018||Letter of September 14, 2018 from counsel for petitioners received.|
|Nov 26 2018||Stipulation to dismiss the petition for a writ of certiorari under Rule 46.1 filed.|
|Nov 27 2018||Petition Dismissed - Rule 46.|
Today at SCOTUS: Can the federal government prioritize certain groups of unauthorized immigrants for deportation over others? And do states have standing to sue the government if they disagree with those priorities? @AHoweBlogger previews U.S. v. Texas:
In U.S. v. Texas, broad questions over immigration enforcement and states’ ability to challenge federal policies - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Tuesday in a dispute over the Biden administration’s authority to...
Today at SCOTUS: The justices return to the bench for oral arguments in a pair of public-corruption cases, both stemming from scandals in New York politics that arose during Andrew Cuomo's time as governor. In both cases, the defendants are claiming prosecutorial overreach.
Cecilia (Cissy) Suyat Marshall, the widow of Thurgood Marshall, died this morning at 94. Here is the court's announcement.
BREAKING: The Supreme Court REJECTS Trump's bid to prevent the House Ways & Means Committee from obtaining his tax returns. No noted dissents.
The brief order may end years of litigation over the committee's efforts to review the tax records of Trump and his businesses.
JUST IN: Whisky, dog toys... and trademark law.
SCOTUS has agreed to hear a dispute between Jack Daniel's and a company that makes squeaking "Bad Spaniels" dog toys. The case will have implications for the tension between parody & intellectual property. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/112122zr_e1p3.pdf
In a quiet Monday morning order list, SCOTUS adds no new cases to its docket. The court will not hear Brooks v. Abbott, a challenge to an alleged racial gerrymander of a state senate district in Texas. Here's the full order list: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/112122zor_7lhn.pdf