|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|15-108||P.R.||Jan 13, 2016||Jun 9, 2016||6-2||Kagan||OT 2015|
Holding: The Double Jeopardy Clause bars Puerto Rico and the United States from successively prosecuting a single person for the same conduct under equivalent criminal laws.
Judgment: Affirmed, 6-2, in an opinion by Justice Kagan on June 9, 2016. Justice Ginsburg filed a concurring opinion, in which Justice Thomas joined. Justice Thomas filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. Justice Breyer filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Sotomayor joined.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jun 5 2015||Application (14A1236) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 18, 2015 to July 20, 2015, submitted to Justice Breyer.|
|Jun 5 2015||Application (14A1236) granted by Justice Breyer extending the time to file until July 20, 2015.|
|Jul 17 2015||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 24, 2015)|
|Aug 24 2015||Brief of respondents Luis M. Sanchez Valle, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Sep 8 2015||Reply of petitioner Commonwealth of Puerto Rico filed.|
|Sep 9 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 28, 2015.|
|Oct 1 2015||Petition GRANTED.|
|Oct 19 2015||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs in support of either party or of neither party received from counsel for the petitioner.|
|Oct 20 2015||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs in support of either party or of neither party received from counsel for the respondents.|
|Nov 16 2015||Joint appendix filed. (Corrected Joint Appendix filed and distributed on 1/31/16.) (Statement of costs filed)|
|Nov 16 2015||Brief of petitioner Commonwealth of Puerto Rico filed.|
|Nov 24 2015||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, January 13, 2016|
|Dec 4 2015||Record requested from the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico.|
|Dec 15 2015||CIRCULATED.|
|Dec 15 2015||Record received from the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico. 1 Box.|
|Dec 16 2015||Brief of respondents Luis M. Sanchez Valle, and James Gomez Vazquez filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 22 2015||Brief amici curiae of Professors Christina Duffy Ponsa and Sam Erman filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 22 2015||Brief amicus curiae of Virgin Islands Bar Association filed.|
|Dec 23 2015||Brief amici curiae of Current and Former Senior Puerto Rico Officials filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 23 2015||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 23 2015||Brief amici curiae of Colegio de Abogados y Abogadas de Puerto Rico, and The Puerto Rican Bar Association filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 23 2015||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Dec 23 2015||Brief amicus curiae of Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers - Miami Chapter filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 5 2016||Reply of petitioner Commonwealth of Puerto Rico filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 8 2016||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Jan 8 2016||Letter from Clerk of Court advising that counsel should be prepared to discuss at oral argument whether this Court has jurisdiction to review the ruling of the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico under 28 U.S.C. Sec.1258.|
|Jan 11 2016||Supplemental brief of petitioner Commonwealth of Puerto Rico filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 12 2016||Letter from counsel for the respondent received.|
|Jan 13 2016||Argued. For petitioner: Christopher Landau, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Adam G. Unikowsky, Washington, D. C.; and Nicole A. Saharsky, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae).|
|Jun 9 2016||Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Kagan, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Ginsburg, and Alito, JJ., joined. Ginsburg, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which Thomas, J., joined. Thomas, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. Breyer, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Sotomayor, J., joined.|
|Jul 12 2016||MANDATE ISSUED|
|Jul 12 2016||JUDGMENT ISSUED|
|Jul 28 2016||Record from the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico has been returned.|
🚨 LIVE NOW 🚨 5PM on IGTV #SimplePolitics join me & @AHoweBlogger editor / reporter for the @SCOTUSblog for a great conversation on the recent decisions by the Supreme Court. There is so much to talk about.
SimplePolitics with Kim Wehle - Special Guest Bill Kristol, Editor-At-Large, The Bulwark
Tonight on #SimplePolitics, Bill Kristol and I have an in-depth conversation about Impeachment, what‘s next for ...
ICYMI: We got Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s first majority opinion today.
SCOTUS rules against immigrant who has lived in the US without authorization for decades. The gov't sought to deport him based on a state misdemeanor conviction (he used a fake Social Security card to get a job). SCOTUS says 5-3 he's not eligible to seek protection from removal.
NEW: In Freedom of Information Act case, SCOTUS says federal government does not have to disclose documents that were produced as part of a rulemaking on "cooling water intake structures" under the Clean Water Act. The Sierra Club argued the docs should be disclosed under FOIA.
At 10:00 a.m. EST, the Supreme Court will hand down one or more opinions in argued cases.
We’ll be live blogging through it at 9:45 with @AHoweBlogger, Mark Walsh, and @jamesromoser.
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, March 4 - SCOTUSblog
We will be live blogging on Thursday, March 4, as the court releases opinions from the 2020-21 term. This live ...
SCOTUS will hear oral argument at 10:00 a.m. EST about when claimants must raise claims in the administrative process – “exhausting” their administrative remedies. Read more from Ronald Mann.
It might sound exhausting! But we claim it might be fun.
Justices to weigh issue exhaustion for Social Security claimants - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in Carr v. Saul involves a surprisingly basic question of administrative law: when claimants ...
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.