Prade v. Ohio

Pending petition
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
19-230 Ohio TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

Issue: Whether, when there is newly discovered evidence making it more likely than not that, in a new trial, the defendant would be acquitted, it violates the 14th Amendment’s due process clause to deny a new trial based on Ohio’s uniquely elevated burden of proof in which criminal defendants with newly discovered evidence are granted a new trial only if they provide clear and convincing evidence that, in a new trial, they would be acquitted.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
May 29 2019Application (18A1243) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 18, 2019 to August 17, 2019, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
May 30 2019Application (18A1243) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until August 19, 2019.
Aug 19 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 20, 2019)
Sep 19 2019Brief of respondent State of Ohio in opposition filed.
Oct 02 2019Reply of petitioner Douglas Prade filed.
Oct 09 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2019.
 
Share:
Term Snapshot
At a Glance
Awards