|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|17-935||8th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2017|
Issue: Whether the undue burden test established in Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey entitles a court to preliminarily enjoin a state abortion law—which mandates a “contracted physician” with hospital admitting privileges that effectively bans medication abortion, offers no discernible medical benefit, and leaves only one remaining abortion provider hundreds of miles away from significant population centers—without making a concrete estimate of the number of women who would be prevented or postponed in having an abortion.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Dec 21 2017||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 1, 2018)|
|Feb 01 2018||Waiver of right of respondents Larry Jegley, et al. to respond filed.|
|Feb 01 2018||Brief amici curiae of Constitutional Law Professors, et al. filed.|
|Feb 01 2018||Brief amici curiae of American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and American Public Health Association filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 07 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/23/2018.|
|Feb 08 2018||Response Requested. (Due March 12, 2018)|
|Feb 14 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 12, 2018 to April 11, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Feb 28 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 11, 2018.|
|Mar 19 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 11, 2018 to April 18, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Mar 27 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 18, 2018.|
|Apr 18 2018||Brief of respondents Larry Jegley, et al. in opposition filed.|
|May 08 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/24/2018.|
|May 08 2018||Reply of petitioners Planned Parenthood of Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|May 29 2018||Petition DENIED.|
Having covered the Supreme Court for six decades, @lylden has seen a lot of changes at 1 First Street. In the latest piece in our series on the post-COVID court, Lyle examines how the court's pandemic operations could spur permanent reform.
How has COVID-19 changed the Supreme Court? And are any of those changes worth keeping? Today we launch a symposium examining those questions.
First up, a piece from @stevenmazie on how to reform oral arguments after the pandemic.
The court after COVID: A recipe for oral argument reform - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court has not yet announced whether it will return to normal operations when the 2021-22 term begins ...
NEW shadow-docket case: New York landlords ask SCOTUS for an emergency order to prevent the state from continuing to enforce its COVID-related eviction moratorium. They say the moratorium "runs roughshod" over their constitutional rights.
Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A8-1.pdf
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.