|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|21-1270||2nd Cir.||TBD||TBD||TBD||TBD||OT 2022|
Issue: Whether Bankruptcy Code Section 363(m) limits the appellate courts’ jurisdiction over any sale order or order deemed “integral” to a sale order, such that it is not subject to waiver, and even when a remedy could be fashioned that does not affect the validity of the sale.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Mar 17 2022||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 20, 2022)|
|Mar 24 2022||Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 20, 2022 to May 20, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Mar 25 2022||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 20, 2022.|
|May 20 2022||Brief of respondents Transform Holdco LLC and Sears Holdings Corporation in opposition filed.|
|May 27 2022||Waiver of the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition under Rule 15.5 filed by petitioner.|
|May 31 2022||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/16/2022.|
|May 31 2022||Reply of petitioner MOAC Mall Holdings LLC filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 21 2022||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/23/2022.|
|Jun 27 2022||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jul 12 2022||Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.|
|Jul 22 2022||Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 29, 2022. The time to file respondents' on the merits is extended to and including October 19, 2022.|
|Aug 23 2022||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, MOAC Mall Holdings LLC|
|Aug 29 2022||Brief of petitioner MOAC Mall Holdings LLC filed.|
|Aug 29 2022||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|Aug 30 2022||Brief amici curiae of The Hon. Judith Fitzgerald (Bankruptcy Judge, Ret.), et al. filed.|
|Sep 06 2022||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.|
|Sep 08 2022||Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Transform Holdco LLC and Sears Holdings Corporation|
We are honored to be chosen as the winner of an American Journalism Online Award for Best Non-profit News Source. Thanks to everyone for reading & supporting SCOTUSblog, including on our opinion-day live blogs, which the awarding judge called a "digital townsquare." #AJOawards
The winner of the award for Best Non-Profit News Source is @scotusblog. Judge @juliachanb called the site “a crucial tool in a political journalist’s toolbox” and praised their recent site revamp and dedication to transparency. https://www.scotusblog.com 2/
Quick Tok explainer on yesterday’s voting rights case at the Supreme Court—Merrill v. Milligan.
The Mar-a-Lago case arrives at the Supreme Court. Here's an explainer on today's filing from @katieleebarlow, who notes that this isn't the first time Trump has asked the justices to intervene in fights over sensitive documents. (Both other times, the court ruled against him.)
In today's Voting Rights Act case, the conservative majority seemed likely to side with Alabama, though perhaps on narrower grounds than the state asked for. Here's @AHoweBlogger's analysis, plus courtroom sketches from Bill Hennessy (AKA @Artisbest).
Conservative justices seem poised to uphold Alabama’s redistricting plan in Voting Rights Act challenge - SCOTUSblog
In February, a divided Supreme Court temporarily blocked a ruling by a three-judge district court in Alabama, which ...
BREAKING: Donald Trump's lawyers have filed an emergency request asking the Supreme Court to intervene in the case over classified documents at Mar-a-Lago. Trump wants SCOTUS to vacate a Sept. 21 ruling by the 11th Circuit. Here is the filing: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/22A283.pdf
Today at SCOTUS: voting rights and veterans' benefits.
First up is Merrill v. Milligan, a case about Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and how to decide if a state's redistricting plan dilutes Black voting power. @AHoweBlogger explains:
When are majority-Black voting districts required? In Alabama case, the justices will review that question. - SCOTUSblog
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act bars election practices that result in a denial or abridgement of the right ...