McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corporation
Issue: Whether the Hobbs Act required the district court in this case to accept the Federal Communications Commission’s legal interpretation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
Date | Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) |
---|
Mar 08 2024 | Application (23A839) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 19, 2024 to May 17, 2024, submitted to Justice Kagan. |
Mar 13 2024 | Application (23A839) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until May 17, 2024. |
May 17 2024 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 20, 2024) |
May 23 2024 | Waiver of right of respondent McKesson Corporation, et al. to respond filed. |
May 28 2024 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2024. |
Jun 05 2024 | Response Requested. (Due July 5, 2024) |
Jun 18 2024 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 5, 2024 to August 5, 2024, submitted to The Clerk. |
Jun 21 2024 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 5, 2024. |
Aug 05 2024 | Brief of respondents McKesson Corporation, et al. in opposition filed. |
Aug 21 2024 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024. |
Aug 21 2024 | Reply of petitioner McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. filed. (Distributed) |