|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-837||11th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2018|
Issue: Whether a state ban on dismemberment abortions is unconstitutional when there is a reasonable medical debate that alternatives to the banned procedure are safe.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 31 2018||Application (18A472) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 20, 2018 to December 20, 2018, submitted to Justice Thomas.|
|Nov 02 2018||Application (18A472) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until December 20, 2018.|
|Dec 20 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 4, 2019)|
|Dec 21 2018||Application of West Alabama Women's Center, et al. for a further extension of time not accepted for filing. (December 28, 2018 - request submitted under the wrong docket number)|
|Jan 02 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 4, 2019 to March 4, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jan 11 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 4, 2019.|
|Jan 18 2019||Brief amici curiae of American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, et al. filed.|
|Jan 30 2019||Brief amici curiae of Foundation for Moral Law, et al. filed.|
|Feb 01 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Trinity Legal Center filed.|
|Feb 04 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Christian Medical & Dental Associations filed.|
|Feb 04 2019||Brief amicus curiae of American Center for Law and Justice filed.|
|Feb 04 2019||Brief amici curiae of Louisiana, et al. filed.|
|Mar 04 2019||Brief of respondents West Alabama Women's Center, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Mar 15 2019||Reply of petitioners Steven T. Marshall, et al. filed.|
|Mar 20 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.|
|Apr 09 2019||Rescheduled.|
|Apr 15 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/18/2019.|
|Apr 16 2019||Rescheduled.|
|Apr 22 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2019.|
|Apr 24 2019||Rescheduled.|
|May 06 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.|
|May 08 2019||Rescheduled.|
|May 13 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2019.|
|May 15 2019||Rescheduled.|
|May 20 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2019.|
|May 21 2019||Rescheduled.|
|May 28 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2019.|
|May 29 2019||Rescheduled.|
|Jun 03 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2019.|
|Jun 05 2019||Rescheduled.|
|Jun 10 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2019.|
|Jun 12 2019||Rescheduled.|
|Jun 17 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2019.|
|Jun 26 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/27/2019.|
|Jun 28 2019||Petition DENIED. Justice Thomas, concurring in the denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion)|
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
We're so excited about our April 15 Live Webinar (w/ @HarvardACS & @HarvardFedSoc), Covering the Court, featuring an all-star lineup of panelists @jduffyrice, @katieleebarlow, @whignewtons, & @stevenmazie! _👩⚖️👩⚖️👩⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️_ Register here ➡️ https://harvard.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_k_b_9IPBQ_GV37rpsjF9kw
Senator Markey (D-Ma) is delivering remarks right now in front of the Supreme Court introducing the Judiciary Act of 2021 to expand the court to 13 justices. He’s flanked by Chairman of House Judiciary, Jerry Nadler (D-NY), and Hank Johnson (D-Ga).
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here:
Cast your vote below!
The “great chief” and the “super chief”: A final showdown in Supreme Court March Madness - SCOTUSblog
Forget Ali vs. Frazier, Celtics vs. Lakers, or Evert vs. Navratilova. It’s time for Marshall vs. Warren. After...
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.