Macias v. Nichols
Petition for certiorari denied on April 20, 2020
Issue: (1) Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit departed from the Supreme Court"s qualified-immunity decisions by finding the officers violated a clearly-established right without acknowledging the governing standard, defining the right specifically or identifying a case involving similar facts; and (2) whether the 9th Circuit"s rule that "civil disputes cannot give rise to probable cause" is overly broad, as the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit has suggested, and inconsistent with District of Columbia v. Wesby.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petitions of the week (Andrew Hamm, February 14, 2020)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
12/18/2019 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 21, 2020) |
01/13/2020 | Waiver of right of respondents Raymond Nichols, et al. to respond filed. |
01/29/2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020. |
02/10/2020 | Response Requested. (Due March 11, 2020) |
03/11/2020 | Brief of respondents Raymond Nicholas, et al. in opposition filed. |
03/23/2020 | Reply of petitioners Daniel Macias, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
03/25/2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020. |
04/20/2020 | Petition DENIED. |