Skip to content

Lo v. United States

Petition for certiorari denied on October 16, 2017

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
16-8327 9th Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2017

Issue: Whether a district court may order an in personam forfeiture money judgment against an impecunious criminal defendant in the absence of a statute expressly authorizing such a form of punishment.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
03/10/2017Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 14, 2017)
03/21/2017Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
03/23/2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 13, 2017.
03/28/2017Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received form counsel petitioner.
04/05/2017Brief amicus curiae of Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers - Miami Chapter filed. (Distributed)
04/11/2017Response Requested. (Due May 11, 2017)
05/03/2017Order extending time to file response to petition to and including June 12, 2017.
06/07/2017Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including June 23, 2017.
06/21/2017Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including August 7, 2017.
07/27/2017Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including September 11, 2017.
09/11/2017Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
09/21/2017Reply of petitioner Henry Lo filed.
09/28/2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/13/2017.
10/16/2017Petition DENIED.