|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-1021||9th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Issue: Whether it is clearly established that the Fourth Amendment prohibits police officers from stealing property listed in a search warrant.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Nov 26 2019||Application (19A604) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 15, 2020 to February 14, 2020, submitted to Justice Kagan.|
|Dec 02 2019||Application (19A604) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until February 14, 2020.|
|Feb 14 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 19, 2020)|
|Feb 27 2020||Waiver of right of respondent City of Fresno, et al. to respond filed.|
|Mar 04 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.|
|Mar 09 2020||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Cato Institute, et al. (Distributed)|
|Mar 11 2020||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by New Civil Liberties Alliance.|
|Mar 12 2020||Response Requested. (Due April 13, 2020)|
|Mar 17 2020||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Institute for Justice.|
|Mar 17 2020||Response to motion of New Civil Liberties Alliance for leave to file as amicus curiae from respondent City of Fresno, et al. filed.|
|Mar 19 2020||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by DKT Liberty Project, et al.|
|Apr 10 2020||Brief of respondents City of Fresno, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Apr 13 2020||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.|
|Apr 13 2020||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Constitutional Accountability Center.|
|Apr 28 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.|
|Apr 28 2020||Reply of petitioners Micah Jessop, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|May 18 2020||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Institute for Justice GRANTED.|
|May 18 2020||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Cato Institute, et al. GRANTED.|
|May 18 2020||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by New Civil Liberties Alliance GRANTED.|
|May 18 2020||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers GRANTED.|
|May 18 2020||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Constitutional Accountability Center GRANTED.|
|May 18 2020||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by DKT Liberty Project, et al. GRANTED.|
|May 18 2020||Petition DENIED.|
|Jun 11 2020||Petition for Rehearing filed.|
|Jul 09 2020||DISTRIBUTED.|
|Aug 03 2020||Rehearing DENIED.|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.