|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|13-433||9th Cir.||Oct 8, 2014||Dec 8, 2014||9-0||Thomas||OT 2014|
Holding: The time spent by warehouse workers waiting to undergo and undergoing security screenings is not compensable under the Fair Labor Standards Act, as amended by the Portal-to-Portal Act.
Judgment: Reversed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on December 8, 2014. Justice Sotomayor filed a concurring opinion, in which Justice Kagan joined.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Aug 5 2013||Application (13A165) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 1, 2013 to October 3, 2013, submitted to Justice Kennedy.|
|Aug 12 2013||Application (13A165) granted by Justice Kennedy extending the time to file until October 3, 2013.|
|Oct 3 2013||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 7, 2013)|
|Oct 15 2013||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel or the petitioners.|
|Nov 4 2013||Waiver of right of respondents Jesse Busk, et al. to respond filed.|
|Nov 7 2013||Brief amici curiae of International Municipal Lawyers Association, et al. filed.|
|Nov 7 2013||Brief amici curiae of Retail Litigation Center Inc., et al. filed.|
|Nov 12 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 26, 2013.|
|Nov 13 2013||Response Requested . (Due December 13, 2013)|
|Dec 3 2013||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including January 13, 2014.|
|Jan 13 2014||Brief of respondents Jesse Busk, and Laurie Castro, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Jan 28 2014||Reply of petitioner Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. filed.|
|Jan 29 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 21, 2014.|
|Feb 24 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 28, 2014.|
|Feb 25 2014||Letter of February 25, 2014, from counsel for respondents received. (Distributed)|
|Mar 3 2014||Petition GRANTED.|
|Mar 26 2014||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including May 28, 2014.|
|Apr 17 2014||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners.|
|Apr 25 2014||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondents|
|May 9 2014||The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including August 4, 2014.|
|May 28 2014||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|May 28 2014||Brief of petitioner Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. filed.|
|Jun 4 2014||Brief amicus curiae of the United States filed.|
|Jun 4 2014||Brief amici curiae of Retail Litigation Center, Inc., et al. filed.|
|Jun 4 2014||Brief amici curiae of National League of Cities, et al. filed.|
|Jun 4 2014||Brief amicus curiae of National Retail Federation filed.|
|Jul 9 2014||Record requested from U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.|
|Jul 16 2014||SET FOR ARGUMENT Wednesday, October 8, 2014|
|Jul 17 2014||Record received from U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER.|
|Jul 17 2014||Record received from U.S.D.C. District of Nevada is electronic and located on PACER.|
|Aug 4 2014||Brief of respondents Jesse Busk and Laurie Castro, et al. filed.|
|Aug 7 2014||CIRCULATED.|
|Aug 8 2014||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Aug 8 2014||Brief amicus curiae of American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 11 2014||Brief amicus curiae of National Employment Lawyers Association filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 3 2014||Reply of petitioner Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 2 2014||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Oct 8 2014||Argued. For petitioner: Paul D. Clement, Washington, D. C.; and Curtis E. Gannon, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondents: Mark R. Thierman, Reno, Nev.|
|Dec 9 2014||Judgment REVERSED. Thomas, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Sotomayor, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which Kagan, J., joined.|
|Jan 12 2015||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
NEW: SCOTUS agrees to take up two new cases. Here's the orders list. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/030121zor_m6hn.pdf
#SCOTUS grants US v. Vaello-Madero, a challenge to exclusion of Puerto Rico residents from eligibility for Supplemental Social Security Income program, which provides benefits to poor disabled adults & children
Good morning. It’s Monday, and it’s March!
At 9:30 a.m. EST, SCOTUS will release orders from Friday’s conference.
At 10:00, the court will consider an appointments clause challenge to administrative patent judges. More from George Quillin & Jeanne Gills.
Justices to consider appointments clause challenge to administrative patent judges - SCOTUSblog
The justices continue their light load for the February argument session next week. First up is Monday’s Unite...
BREAKING: SCOTUS orders California’s Santa Clara County to allow churches to hold indoor services. Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan dissent. Here’s the short shadow docket order.
#SCOTUS grants emergency request from northern California churches to allow indoor worship services pending appeal, says result is "clearly dictated" by recent decision. Kagan dissents, joined by Breyer & Sotomayor: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/022621zr_1bo2.pdf
Just in: SCOTUS opinions expected next Thursday.
#SCOTUS website indicates that the Court will release orders from today's conference on Monday morning, March 1, at 9:30 am, with opinions again on Thursday, March 4, at 10 am. Justices will also hear oral arguments next week, including in Arizona voting dispute on Tuesday.
Apparently all the action today at #SCOTUS was not limited to opinion announcements at 10 am. Major new cert. petition filed today challenging Harvard admissions policy. https://twitter.com/GregStohr/status/1364962610177843210
NEW: Supreme Court asked to outlaw race-based college admissions. Group challenging Harvard admissions policy says it files appeal asking court to over 2003 Grutter decision.
SCOTUS rules against a college student who tried to sue police officers after they mistook him for a criminal suspect and tackled/beat him. The unanimous ruling involves a technical interpretation of the "judgment bar" under the Federal Tort Claims Act. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/19-546_7mip.pdf
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.