|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-6156||5th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Issue: Whether Randy Halprin’s second federal petition raising a judicial bias claim is “second or successive” under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2) if the judge concealed his bias by failing to recuse himself, and the public exposure of his bigotry after the conclusion of Halprin’s initial habeas proceedings in the district court created Halprin’s first fair opportunity to present his claim.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 03 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 4, 2019)|
|Oct 03 2019||Application (19A377) for a stay of execution of sentence of death, submitted to Justice Alito.|
|Oct 29 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 4, 2019 to December 4, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Oct 31 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 4, 2019.|
|Nov 26 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 4, 2019 to January 3, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Nov 29 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including January 3, 2020.|
|Jan 03 2020||Brief of respondent Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutions Division in opposition to petition for a writ of certiorari and application (19A377) for a stay of execution filed.|
|Jan 13 2020||Reply of petitioner Randy Halprin filed.|
|Jan 16 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.|
|Feb 24 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2020.|
|Mar 02 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/6/2020.|
|Mar 16 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.|
|Mar 23 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/27/2020.|
|Mar 30 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/3/2020.|
|Apr 06 2020||Petition DENIED. Statement of Justice Sotomayor respecting the denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion)|
Having covered the Supreme Court for six decades, @lylden has seen a lot of changes at 1 First Street. In the latest piece in our series on the post-COVID court, Lyle examines how the court's pandemic operations could spur permanent reform.
How has COVID-19 changed the Supreme Court? And are any of those changes worth keeping? Today we launch a symposium examining those questions.
First up, a piece from @stevenmazie on how to reform oral arguments after the pandemic.
The court after COVID: A recipe for oral argument reform - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court has not yet announced whether it will return to normal operations when the 2021-22 term begins ...
NEW shadow-docket case: New York landlords ask SCOTUS for an emergency order to prevent the state from continuing to enforce its COVID-related eviction moratorium. They say the moratorium "runs roughshod" over their constitutional rights.
Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A8-1.pdf
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...