|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-6156||5th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Issue: Whether Randy Halprin’s second federal petition raising a judicial bias claim is “second or successive” under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2) if the judge concealed his bias by failing to recuse himself, and the public exposure of his bigotry after the conclusion of Halprin’s initial habeas proceedings in the district court created Halprin’s first fair opportunity to present his claim.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 03 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 4, 2019)|
|Oct 03 2019||Application (19A377) for a stay of execution of sentence of death, submitted to Justice Alito.|
|Oct 29 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 4, 2019 to December 4, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Oct 31 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 4, 2019.|
|Nov 26 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 4, 2019 to January 3, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Nov 29 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including January 3, 2020.|
|Jan 03 2020||Brief of respondent Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutions Division in opposition to petition for a writ of certiorari and application (19A377) for a stay of execution filed.|
|Jan 13 2020||Reply of petitioner Randy Halprin filed.|
|Jan 16 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.|
|Feb 24 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2020.|
|Mar 02 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/6/2020.|
|Mar 16 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.|
|Mar 23 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/27/2020.|
|Mar 30 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/3/2020.|
|Apr 06 2020||Petition DENIED. Statement of Justice Sotomayor respecting the denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion)|
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Congratulations to Gail Curley, the new Marshal of the Supreme Court. The Marshal supervises the Court's police, cries in the Court with the familiar "Oyez," and (somewhat oddly) is responsible for paying the Justices' salaries. https://twitter.com/joshgerstein/status/1389212773108920323
JUST IN: If you’re the kind of person always expecting the Marshal of the Supreme Court to make an arrest, there’s a new sheriff in town #SCOTUS
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.