|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|15-497||6th Cir.||Oct 31, 2016||Feb 22, 2017||8-0||Kagan||OT 2016|
Holding: (1) Exhaustion of the administrative procedures established by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act is unnecessary when the gravamen of the plaintiff's suit is something other than the denial of the IDEA's core guarantee of a "free appropriate public education"; and (2) the case is remanded to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit for a proper analysis of whether the gravamen of E.F.'s complaint -- which alleges only disability-based discrimination, without making any reference to the adequacy of the special-education services E.F.'s school provided -- charges, and seeks relief for, the denial of a FAPE.
Judgment: Vacated and remanded, 8-0, in an opinion by Justice Kagan on February 22, 2017. Justice Alito filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment, in which Justice Thomas joined.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 15 2015||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 18, 2015)|
|Nov 5 2015||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including December 18, 2015.|
|Dec 18 2015||Brief of respondents Napoleon Community Schools, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Dec 23 2015||Reply of petitioners Stacy Fry, et vir, as next friends of minor E. F. filed.|
|Dec 30 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 15, 2016.|
|Jan 19 2016||The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.|
|May 20 2016||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.|
|May 31 2016||Supplemental brief of respondents Napoleon Community Schools, et al. filed.|
|May 31 2016||Supplemental brief of petitioners Stacy Fry, et vir, as next friends of minor E. F. filed.|
|Jun 7 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 23, 2016.|
|Jun 27 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 27, 2016.|
|Jun 28 2016||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jul 27 2016||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including August 22, 2016.|
|Jul 27 2016||The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including September 30, 2016.|
|Aug 2 2016||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondents.|
|Aug 2 2016||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, from counsel for the petitioners.|
|Aug 22 2016||Joint appendix filed.|
|Aug 22 2016||Brief of petitioners Stacy Fry, et vir, as Next Friends of Minor E. F. filed.|
|Aug 26 2016||Brief amici curiae of Psychiatric Service Dog Partners, Inc., et al. filed.|
|Aug 29 2016||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.|
|Aug 29 2016||Brief amici curiae of National Disability Rights Network, et al. filed.|
|Aug 29 2016||Brief amici curiae of Professor Thomas Hehir, et al. filed.|
|Aug 29 2016||Brief amici curiae of Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates, et al. filed.|
|Aug 29 2016||Brief amicus curiae of Hon. Lowell P. Weicker, Jr. filed.|
|Aug 29 2016||Brief amici curiae of Illinois and Minnesota filed.|
|Aug 29 2016||Brief amicus curiae of Autism Speaks filed.|
|Sep 2 2016||SET FOR ARGUMENT On Monday, October 31, 2016|
|Sep 9 2016||Record has been requested from the U.S.C.A. 6th Circuit.|
|Sep 20 2016||Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Sep 28 2016||CIRCULATED|
|Sep 30 2016||Brief of respondents Napoleon Community Schools, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 7 2016||Brief amici curiae of National School Boards Association, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 17 2016||Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Oct 20 2016||Reply of petitioners Stacy Fry, et vir, as Next Friends of Minor E. F. filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 31 2016||Argued. For petitioners: Samuel R. Bagenstos, Ann Arbor, Mich.; and Roman Martinez, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondents: Neal K. Katyal, Washington, D. C.|
|Feb 22 2017||Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Kagan, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, and Sotomayor, JJ., joined. Alito, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment, in which Thomas, J., joined.|
|Mar 27 2017||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.