|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-368||Mont.||Oct 7, 2020||TBD||TBD||TBD||OT 2020|
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondents in this case.
Issue: Whether the “arise out of or relate to” requirement for a state court to exercise specific personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant under Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz is met when none of the defendant’s forum contacts caused the plaintiff’s claims, such that the plaintiff’s claims would be the same even if the defendant had no forum contacts.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jul 24 2019||Application (19A103) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 19, 2019 to September 18, 2019, submitted to Justice Kagan.|
|Jul 25 2019||Application (19A103) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until September 18, 2019.|
|Sep 18 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 21, 2019)|
|Sep 26 2019||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Ford Motor Company.|
|Oct 01 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 21, 2019 to November 20, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Oct 04 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 20, 2019.|
|Oct 21 2019||Brief amici curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed.|
|Oct 21 2019||Brief amicus curiae of The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers filed. VIDED.|
|Nov 20 2019||Brief of respondent Charles Lucero, personal representative of the Estate of Markkaya Jean Gullett in opposition filed.|
|Dec 04 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.|
|Dec 04 2019||Reply of petitioner Ford Motor Company filed.|
|Jan 13 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/17/2020.|
|Jan 17 2020||Petition GRANTED. The petition for a writ of certiorari in No. 19-369 is granted. The cases are consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. VIDED.|
|Jan 17 2020||Because the Court has consolidated these cases for briefing and oral argument, future filings and activity in the cases will now be reflected on the docket of No. 19-368. Subsequent filings in these cases must therefore be submitted through the electronic filing system in No. 19-368. Each document submitted in connection with one or more of these cases must include on its cover the case number and caption for each case in which the filing is intended to be submitted. Where a filing is submitted in fewer than all of the cases, the docket entry will reflect the case number(s) in which the filing is submitted; a document filed in all of the consolidated cases will be noted as “VIDED.”|
|Jan 27 2020||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Ford Motor Company.VIDED.|
|Feb 21 2020||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, April 27, 2020. VIDED.|
|Feb 26 2020||Record requested from the Supreme Court of Montana.|
|Feb 28 2020||Joint appendix filed (statement of costs filed). VIDED.|
|Feb 28 2020||Brief of petitioner Ford Motor Company filed. VIDED.|
|Mar 04 2020||The record of the Supreme Court of Montana is available on its' website (www.supremecourtdocket.mt.gov).|
|Mar 05 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Product Liability Advisory Council, Inc. filed. VIDED.|
|Mar 06 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed. VIDED.|
|Mar 06 2020||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed. VIDED.|
|Mar 06 2020||Brief amici curiae of The Alliance for Automobile Innovation, et al. filed. VIDED.|
|Mar 06 2020||Brief amici curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed. VIDED.|
|Mar 06 2020||Brief amici curiae of Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) filed. VIDED.|
|Mar 06 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Institute of International Bankers filed. VIDED.|
|Mar 06 2020||Brief amicus curiae of DRI - The Voice Of The Defense Bar filed. VIDED.|
|Mar 19 2020||CIRCULATED|
|Mar 30 2020||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed. VIDED.|
|Mar 30 2020||Brief of respondents Charles Lucero, personal representative of the Estate of Markkaya Jean Gullett, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Apr 02 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Professor Jonathan R. Nash filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Apr 02 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Civil Procedure Professors filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Apr 03 2020||ORAL ARGUMENT POSTPONED. VIDED.|
|Apr 03 2020||Brief amici curiae of Civil Procedure and Federal Courts Professors filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Apr 03 2020||Brief amicus curiae of The Center for Auto Safety filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Apr 06 2020||Motion of Minnesota, et al. for leave to participate in oral argument as amici curiae and for divided argument filed. VIDED.|
|Apr 06 2020||Brief amici curiae of Professors of Jurisdiction filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Apr 06 2020||Brief amici curiae of Civil Procedure Professors Pamela K. Bookman, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Apr 06 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Foundation for Moral Law filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Apr 06 2020||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Home Builders filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Apr 06 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Main Street Alliance filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Apr 06 2020||Brief amici curiae of American Association for Justice and Public Justice, P.C. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Apr 06 2020||Brief amici curiae of Minnesota, Texas, 37 Other States and The District of Columbia filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Apr 13 2020||Argument to be rescheduled for the October Term 2020. VIDED.|
|Apr 20 2020||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument DENIED. VIDED.|
|Apr 20 2020||Motion of Minnesota, et al. for leave to participate in oral argument as amici curiae and for divided argument DENIED. VIDED.|
|Apr 29 2020||Reply of petitioner Ford Motor Company filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Jul 13 2020||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, October 7, 2020. VIDED.|
|Oct 07 2020||Argued. For petitioner: Sean Marotta, Washington, D.C. For respondents: Deepak Gupta, Washington, D. C. VIDED.|
|Dec 16 2020||Record from the 8th Judicial District Court of Montana electronically received.|
NEW: SCOTUS agrees to take up two new cases. Here's the orders list. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/030121zor_m6hn.pdf
#SCOTUS grants US v. Vaello-Madero, a challenge to exclusion of Puerto Rico residents from eligibility for Supplemental Social Security Income program, which provides benefits to poor disabled adults & children
Good morning. It’s Monday, and it’s March!
At 9:30 a.m. EST, SCOTUS will release orders from Friday’s conference.
At 10:00, the court will consider an appointments clause challenge to administrative patent judges. More from George Quillin & Jeanne Gills.
Justices to consider appointments clause challenge to administrative patent judges - SCOTUSblog
The justices continue their light load for the February argument session next week. First up is Monday’s Unite...
BREAKING: SCOTUS orders California’s Santa Clara County to allow churches to hold indoor services. Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan dissent. Here’s the short shadow docket order.
#SCOTUS grants emergency request from northern California churches to allow indoor worship services pending appeal, says result is "clearly dictated" by recent decision. Kagan dissents, joined by Breyer & Sotomayor: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/022621zr_1bo2.pdf
Just in: SCOTUS opinions expected next Thursday.
#SCOTUS website indicates that the Court will release orders from today's conference on Monday morning, March 1, at 9:30 am, with opinions again on Thursday, March 4, at 10 am. Justices will also hear oral arguments next week, including in Arizona voting dispute on Tuesday.
Apparently all the action today at #SCOTUS was not limited to opinion announcements at 10 am. Major new cert. petition filed today challenging Harvard admissions policy. https://twitter.com/GregStohr/status/1364962610177843210
NEW: Supreme Court asked to outlaw race-based college admissions. Group challenging Harvard admissions policy says it files appeal asking court to over 2003 Grutter decision.
SCOTUS rules against a college student who tried to sue police officers after they mistook him for a criminal suspect and tackled/beat him. The unanimous ruling involves a technical interpretation of the "judgment bar" under the Federal Tort Claims Act. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/19-546_7mip.pdf
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.