|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|11-1327||Mich.||Nov 6, 2012||Feb 20, 2013||8-1||Sotomayor||OT 2012|
Holding: The Double Jeopardy Clause bars retrial following a court-directed acquittal, even if the acquittal was erroneous.
Judgment: Reversed, 8-1, in an opinion by Justice Sotomayor on February 20, 2013. Justice Alito filed a dissenting opinion.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|May 2 2012||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 4, 2012)|
|May 8 2012||Brief of respondent Michigan in opposition filed.|
|May 16 2012||Reply of petitioner Lamar Evans filed.|
|May 22 2012||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 7, 2012.|
|Jun 11 2012||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jun 13 2012||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner Lamar Evans.|
|Jun 20 2012||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner.|
|Jun 29 2012||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED.|
|Jul 13 2012||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 17, 2012.|
|Jul 13 2012||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including October 5, 2012.|
|Jul 23 2012||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, November 6, 2012|
|Aug 14 2012||Record received from Supreme Court of Michigan. (1 envelope)|
|Aug 15 2012||Brief of petitioner Lamar Evans filed.|
|Aug 17 2012||Record received from Court of Appeals of Michigan. (1 envelope)|
|Aug 22 2012||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 24 2012||CIRCULATED.|
|Oct 5 2012||Brief of respondent Michigan filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 12 2012||Brief amicus curiae of the United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 12 2012||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Oct 26 2012||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Oct 29 2012||Reply of petitioner Lamar Evans filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 6 2012||Argued. For petitioner: David A. Moran, Ann Arbor, Mich. For respondent: Timothy A. Baughman, Detroit, Mich.; and Curtis E. Gannon, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.)|
|Feb 20 2013||Judgment REVERSED. Sotomayor, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Alito, J., filed a dissenting opinion.|
|Mar 25 2013||MANDATE ISSUED.|
|May 8 2013||Record returned to Supreme Court of Michigan.|
|May 8 2013||Record returned to Court of Appeals of Michigan.|
NEW: The Justice Department, as expected, says it plans to ask the Supreme Court to block enforcement of the Texas law that bans abortions after six weeks of pregnancy.
NEW: Biden's commission studying proposals for Supreme Court reform has released 200+ pages of "discussion materials" in advance of its final report, slated to be issued next month. The materials are divided into five categories and are available here: https://www.whitehouse.gov/pcscotus/public-meetings/october-15-2021-pcscotus-meeting/
Curious: This morning the Supreme Court website had a dropdown menu option called “financial disclosure reports” (although nothing to see when you click on it). Now it’s gone
Today at SCOTUS: The Biden administration will appear before the justices asking to reinstate the death penalty for Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev -- despite Biden's campaign pledge to end the death penalty and the DOJ's recent moratorium on federal executions.
Brett Kavanaugh was back on the bench today after participating in last week's arguments remotely due to his positive COVID test. Here's the full nine-person bench, in a sketch by @Courtartist.
#SCOTUS calls for the views of the US Solicitor General in Epic Systems v. Tata Consultancy Services, re whether a punitive damages award that complies with a state law that caps punitive damages passes constitutional muster