|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-459||9th Cir.||Apr 15, 2019||Apr 23, 2019||N/A||Per Curiam||OT 2018|
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondents in this case.
Issue: Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit correctly held, in express disagreement with five other courts of appeals, that Section 14(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 supports an inferred private right of action based on the negligent misstatement or omission made in connection with a tender offer.
Judgment: The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted in a per curiam opinion on April 23, 2019.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 11 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 13, 2018)|
|Oct 16 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 13, 2018 to November 30, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Oct 18 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 30, 2018.|
|Nov 13 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association filed.|
|Nov 13 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed.|
|Nov 30 2018||Brief of respondents Gary Varjabedian, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Dec 18 2018||Reply of petitioners Emulex Corporation, et al. filed.|
|Dec 19 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.|
|Jan 04 2019||Petition GRANTED.|
|Feb 06 2019||Blanket Consent filed by Respondents, Gary Varjabedian, et al.|
|Feb 11 2019||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, April 15, 2019|
|Feb 19 2019||Joint appendix (2 volumes) filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|Feb 19 2019||Brief of petitioners Emulex Corporation, et al. filed.|
|Feb 25 2019||Brief amici curiae of Former Commissioners of the Securities and Exchange Commission filed.|
|Feb 26 2019||Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and Business Roundtable filed.|
|Feb 26 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association filed.|
|Feb 26 2019||Brief amicus curiae of United States in support of neither party filed.|
|Feb 26 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed.|
|Feb 26 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Phillip Goldstein filed.|
|Mar 20 2019||CIRCULATED|
|Mar 21 2019||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.|
|Mar 21 2019||Brief of respondents Gary Varjabedian, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 22 2019||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Mar 28 2019||Brief amicus curiae of North American Securities Administrators Association, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 28 2019||Brief amici curiae of Institutional Investors filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 28 2019||Brief amici curiae of Legal Scholars filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 01 2019||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Apr 08 2019||Reply of petitioners Emulex Corporation, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 15 2019||Argued. For petitioners: Gregory G. Garre, Bethesda, Md. For United States, as amicus curiae: Morgan L. Ratner, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Daniel L. Geyser, Dallas, Tex.|
|Apr 23 2019||Writ of certiorari DISMISSED as improvidently granted. Opinion per curiam.|
|May 28 2019||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
Having covered the Supreme Court for six decades, @lylden has seen a lot of changes at 1 First Street. In the latest piece in our series on the post-COVID court, Lyle examines how the court's pandemic operations could spur permanent reform.
How has COVID-19 changed the Supreme Court? And are any of those changes worth keeping? Today we launch a symposium examining those questions.
First up, a piece from @stevenmazie on how to reform oral arguments after the pandemic.
The court after COVID: A recipe for oral argument reform - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court has not yet announced whether it will return to normal operations when the 2021-22 term begins ...
NEW shadow-docket case: New York landlords ask SCOTUS for an emergency order to prevent the state from continuing to enforce its COVID-related eviction moratorium. They say the moratorium "runs roughshod" over their constitutional rights.
Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A8-1.pdf
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...