|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-459||9th Cir.||Apr 15, 2019||Apr 23, 2019||N/A||Per Curiam||OT 2018|
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondents in this case.
Issue: Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit correctly held, in express disagreement with five other courts of appeals, that Section 14(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 supports an inferred private right of action based on the negligent misstatement or omission made in connection with a tender offer.
Judgment: The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted in a per curiam opinion on April 23, 2019.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 11 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 13, 2018)|
|Oct 16 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 13, 2018 to November 30, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Oct 18 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 30, 2018.|
|Nov 13 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association filed.|
|Nov 13 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed.|
|Nov 30 2018||Brief of respondents Gary Varjabedian, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Dec 18 2018||Reply of petitioners Emulex Corporation, et al. filed.|
|Dec 19 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.|
|Jan 04 2019||Petition GRANTED.|
|Feb 06 2019||Blanket Consent filed by Respondents, Gary Varjabedian, et al.|
|Feb 11 2019||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, April 15, 2019|
|Feb 19 2019||Joint appendix (2 volumes) filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|Feb 19 2019||Brief of petitioners Emulex Corporation, et al. filed.|
|Feb 25 2019||Brief amici curiae of Former Commissioners of the Securities and Exchange Commission filed.|
|Feb 26 2019||Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and Business Roundtable filed.|
|Feb 26 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association filed.|
|Feb 26 2019||Brief amicus curiae of United States in support of neither party filed.|
|Feb 26 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed.|
|Feb 26 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Phillip Goldstein filed.|
|Mar 20 2019||CIRCULATED|
|Mar 21 2019||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.|
|Mar 21 2019||Brief of respondents Gary Varjabedian, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 22 2019||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Mar 28 2019||Brief amicus curiae of North American Securities Administrators Association, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 28 2019||Brief amici curiae of Institutional Investors filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 28 2019||Brief amici curiae of Legal Scholars filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 01 2019||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Apr 08 2019||Reply of petitioners Emulex Corporation, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 15 2019||Argued. For petitioners: Gregory G. Garre, Bethesda, Md. For United States, as amicus curiae: Morgan L. Ratner, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Daniel L. Geyser, Dallas, Tex.|
|Apr 23 2019||Writ of certiorari DISMISSED as improvidently granted. Opinion per curiam.|
|May 28 2019||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
Today at SCOTUS: Two oral arguments starting at 10 a.m. EST. One is on federal anti-discrimination laws. The other is on Medicare payments for drugs dispensed by hospitals -- with big questions about the doctrine of Chevron deference lurking in the background.
Bill Cosby’s prosecutors asked the Supreme Court to reinstate his conviction today. Quick explainer.
In our latest episode of SCOTUStalk, @shefalil of @19thnews joined us to preview Wednesday's argument in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health. Shefali explains the current state of abortion access and the case's implications in Mississippi and across America.
Roe, Dobbs, and the current state of abortion access - SCOTUSblog
In advance of Wednesday's oral argument in the momentous abortion case, Shefali Luthra, a gender and health care r...
Update: Without calling for a response or referring the case to the full court, Justice Breyer just rejected last week's challenge from Massachusetts hospital workers who object to the hospital's COVID vaccine mandate.
(Breyer handles emergency requests from Massachusetts.)
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket challenge to a COVID vaccine mandate. This one is from employees at Mass General Brigham who say the Boston-based hospital violated federal law by not granting them exemptions from the hospital's vaccine policy. Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/21A175.pdf
Today at SCOTUS: The justices return to the bench for oral argument in a case about Medicare payments to hospitals that serve low-income patients. Lots of money at stake, plus potential implications for the Chevron doctrine. @JACoganJr explains the case:
Money for safety-net hospitals at stake in dispute over Medicare payment formula - SCOTUSblog
When it comes to highlighting the complexity of the Medicare Act and its hospital payment rules, Becerra v. Empire...
Two days from now, SCOTUS will hear the biggest abortion case in a generation. In a battle over a Mississippi law, abortion opponents are asking the court to end the constitutional right to abortion. Here's our preview of the case, via @AHoweBlogger.
Roe v. Wade hangs in balance as reshaped court prepares to hear biggest abortion case in decades - SCOTUSblog
When he ran for president in 2016, then-candidate Donald Trump promised to nominate Supreme Court justices who would...