|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-5421||5th Cir.||Not Argued||Mar 23, 2020||N/A||Per Curiam||OT 2019|
Holding: There is no legal basis for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit’s practice of declining to review certain unpreserved factual arguments for plain error.
Judgment: Vacated and remanded in a per curiam opinion on March 23, 2020.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jul 29 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 30, 2019)|
|Aug 07 2019||Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.|
|Aug 15 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.|
|Aug 22 2019||Response Requested. (Due September 23, 2019)|
|Sep 20 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 23, 2019 to October 23, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Sep 23 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 23, 2019.|
|Oct 18 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 23, 2019 to November 22, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Oct 21 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including November 22, 2019.|
|Oct 25 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 22, 2019 to December 6, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Oct 25 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including December 6, 2019.|
|Dec 06 2019||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.|
|Dec 23 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.|
|Dec 23 2019||Reply of petitioner Charles Earl Davis filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 08 2020||Rescheduled.|
|Jan 30 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.|
|Feb 24 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2020.|
|Mar 02 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/6/2020.|
|Mar 16 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.|
|Mar 23 2020||Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Opinion per curiam. (Detached Opinion)|
|Apr 24 2020||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
The Supreme Court got rid of several cases this morning -- in one fell swoop. Read @AHoweBlogger's latest coverage of the emoluments cases, spiritual advisers at Texas executions, Texas abortion policies, COVID restrictions, and NY political corruption.
Justices vacate rulings on Trump and emoluments - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court on Monday morning released orders from the justices’ private conference on Friday, Jan. 22. The justices once again did not ac...
In this morning's orders list, SCOTUS took no action on pending cert petitions involving:
- Mississippi's near-ban on abortions after 15 weeks,
- a Trump rule banning Title X clinics from providing abortion referrals,
- the Trump administration's "public charge" immigration rule.
No real opinions today. The Supreme Court dismissed cert as "improvidently granted" in Henry Schein Inc. v. Archer and White Sales Inc.—a case about arbitration agreements.
That's all for today, folks.
The Supreme Court does not add any cases to its docket. It sends the Trump emoluments case back to the lower court with instructions to dismiss as moot.
Here is the orders list. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/012521zor_3f14.pdf
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.