Breaking News

Crow v. Fontenot

Petition for certiorari denied on June 6, 2022
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
21-970 10th Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2021

Issue: Whether “new” evidence, as referred to in Schlup v. Delo and McQuiggin v. Perkins, means evidence that was not available at the time of trial or, under the broad reading adopted below, encompasses any evidence, including evidence known by the defendant and/or available with due diligence, not presented at trial.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
Jan 03 2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 7, 2022)
Jan 24 2022Waiver of right of respondent Karl Fontenot to respond filed.
Jan 26 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
Feb 01 2022Response Requested. (Due March 3, 2022)
Feb 16 2022Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 3, 2022 to May 2, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
Feb 17 2022Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 2, 2022.
May 02 2022Brief of respondent Karl Fontenot in opposition filed.
May 11 2022Reply of petitioner Scott Crow filed.
May 17 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/2/2022.
Jun 06 2022Petition DENIED.