Cohen v. Apple, Inc.
||Op. Below ||Argument
Issue: Whether state health and safety laws are impliedly preempted, under a purposes-and-objectives theory, by the Federal Communications Commission’s procedural guidelines for reporting how much radiation a cellphone emits.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding)|
|Nov 10 2022||Application (22A427) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 24, 2022 to January 23, 2023, submitted to Justice Kagan.|
|Nov 15 2022||Application (22A427) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until January 23, 2023.|
|Jan 23 2023||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 27, 2023)|
|Jan 26 2023||Waiver of right of respondent Apple, Inc. to respond filed.|
|Feb 01 2023||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.|
|Feb 13 2023||Response Requested. (Due March 15, 2023)|
|Mar 01 2023||Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 15, 2023 to April 14, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Mar 02 2023||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 14, 2023.|
|Mar 15 2023||Amicus brief of City of Berkeley submitted.|
|Mar 15 2023||Amicus brief of Children’s Health Defense submitted.|