|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-247||9th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Issue: Whether the enforcement of generally applicable laws regulating public camping and sleeping constitutes “cruel and unusual punishment” prohibited by the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jun 03 2019||Application (18A1264) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 30, 2019 to August 29, 2019, submitted to Justice Kagan.|
|Jun 04 2019||Application (18A1264) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until August 29, 2019.|
|Aug 22 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 25, 2019)|
|Sep 05 2019||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, City of Boise.|
|Sep 06 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 25, 2019 to October 25, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Sep 06 2019||Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Robert Martin, et al.|
|Sep 09 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 25, 2019.|
|Sep 20 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Brentwood Community Council filed.|
|Sep 20 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Criminal Justice Legal Foundation filed.|
|Sep 23 2019||Brief amicus curiae of The Downtown Denver Partnership filed.|
|Sep 24 2019||Amicus brief of Amici Curiae States of Idaho, Alaska, Indiana, Louisiana, Nebraska, South Dakota and Texas not accepted for filing. (September 24, 2019 -- Corrected version to be submitted)|
|Sep 24 2019||Brief amici curiae of Amici Curiae California State Association of Counties and 33 California Counties and Cities filed.|
|Sep 24 2019||Brief amicus curiae of City of Aberdeen, Washington filed.|
|Sep 24 2019||Brief amici curiae of Amici Curiae States of Idaho, Alaska, Indiana, Louisiana, Nebraska, South Dakota and Texas filed.|
|Sep 24 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Boise Metro Chamber of Commerce, Inc. filed.|
|Sep 25 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Stephen Eide filed.|
|Sep 25 2019||Brief amici curiae of Seven Cities in Orange County filed.|
|Sep 25 2019||Brief amici curiae of California State Sheriffs' Association, California Police Chiefs Association, and California Peace Officers' Association filed.|
|Sep 25 2019||Brief amici curiae of Maryrose Courtney and Ketchum-Downtown YMCA filed.|
|Sep 25 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence filed.|
|Sep 25 2019||Brief amici curiae of The People Concern and Weingart Center Association filed.|
|Sep 25 2019||Brief amici curiae of Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce and Central City Association filed.|
|Sep 25 2019||Brief amici curiae of International Municipal Lawyers Association, et al. filed.|
|Sep 25 2019||Brief amicus curiae of League of Oregon Cities filed.|
|Sep 25 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Venice Stakeholders Association filed.|
|Sep 25 2019||Brief amicus curiae of City of Los Angeles filed.|
|Sep 25 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Building Owners and Managers Association of Oregon filed.|
|Sep 25 2019||Brief amici curiae of International Downtown Association, et al. filed.|
|Oct 25 2019||Brief of respondents Robert Martin, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Nov 13 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.|
|Nov 13 2019||Reply of petitioner City of Boise filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 09 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/13/2019.|
|Dec 16 2019||Petition DENIED.|
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
We're so excited about our April 15 Live Webinar (w/ @HarvardACS & @HarvardFedSoc), Covering the Court, featuring an all-star lineup of panelists @jduffyrice, @katieleebarlow, @whignewtons, & @stevenmazie! _👩⚖️👩⚖️👩⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️_ Register here ➡️ https://harvard.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_k_b_9IPBQ_GV37rpsjF9kw
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.