Carpenter v. United States

Docket No.	Op. Below	Argument	Opinion	Vote	Author	Term
16-402	6th Cir.	Nov 29, 2017	Jun 22, 2018	5-4	Roberts	OT 2017

Holding: The government’s acquisition of Timothy Carpenter’s cell-site records from his wireless carriers was a Fourth Amendment search; the government did not obtain a warrant supported by probable cause before acquiring those records.

Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 5-4, in an opinion by Chief Justice Roberts on June 22, 2018. Justice Kennedy filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Thomas and Alito joined. Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion. Justice Alito filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Thomas joined. Justice Gorsuch filed a dissenting opinion.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

The Annual: OT2017 in Review (First Mondays, July 9, 2018)
OT2017 #30: "Most Ambitious Crossovers" (First Mondays, June 25, 2018)
Opinion analysis: Court holds that police will generally need a warrant for sustained cellphone location information (Updated) (Amy Howe, June 22, 2018)
A "view" from the courtroom: "Some good and hard thinking on all sides" (Mark Walsh, June 22, 2018)
OT2017 #9: "Peak SG" (First Mondays, December 11, 2017)
OT2017 #8: "Bespoke but Blank" (First Mondays, December 4, 2017)
Argument analysis: Drawing a line on privacy for cellphone records, but where? (Amy Howe, November 29, 2017)
OT2017 #7: “Keys to a Valet” (First Mondays, November 27, 2017)
Argument preview: The justices return to cellphones and the Fourth Amendment (Amy Howe, November 22, 2017)
In Recess #3: "Third Class Webelo" (First Mondays, August 14, 2017)
Symposium: Carpenter and the eyewitness rule (Orin Kerr, August 4, 2017)
Symposium: Millions of tiny constables – Time to set the record straight on the Fourth Amendment and location-data privacy (Alan Butler, August 3, 2017)
Symposium: Will the Fourth Amendment protect 21st-century data? The court confronts the third-party doctrine (Jennifer Lynch, August 2, 2017)
Symposium: A defense of the doctrine (David LaBahn, August 2, 2017)
Symposium: Justices poised to consider, or reconsider, Fourth Amendment doctrines as they assess the scope of privacy in a digital age (John Castellano, August 1, 2017)
Symposium: Granular analysis versus doctrine in Carpenter (Jim Harper, August 1, 2017)
The justices return to cellphones and the Fourth Amendment: In Plain English (Amy Howe, July 31, 2017)
Justices to tackle cellphone data case next term (Amy Howe, June 5, 2017)
Petition of the day (Kate Howard, October 31, 2016)

Date	Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
Sep 26 2016	Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 28, 2016)
Oct 21 2016	Order extending time to file response to petition to and including November 28, 2016.
Oct 28 2016	Brief amici curiae of Electronic Frontier Foundation, et al. filed.
Oct 28 2016	Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed.
Nov 21 2016	Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including December 28, 2016.
Dec 15 2016	Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including January 27, 2016.
Jan 27 2017	Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
Feb 10 2017	Reply of petitioner Timothy Ivory Carpenter filed.
Feb 15 2017	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 3, 2017.
Feb 23 2017	Rescheduled.
Mar 22 2017	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 13, 2017.
Apr 17 2017	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 21, 2017.
Apr 24 2017	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 28, 2017.
May 08 2017	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 11, 2017.
May 15 2017	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 18, 2017.
May 22 2017	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 25, 2017.
May 30 2017	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 1, 2017.
Jun 05 2017	Petition GRANTED.
Jun 22 2017	The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 7, 2017.
Jun 22 2017	The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including September 25, 2017.
Jul 11 2017	Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs in support of either party or neither party received from counsel for the petitioner.
Jul 12 2017	Motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis filed by petitioner Timothy I. Carpenter.
Jul 12 2017	Motion to appoint counsel filed by petitioner Timothy I. Carpenter.
Jul 26 2017	Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs in support of either or neither party received from counsel for the respondent.
Aug 02 2017	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/25/2017.
Aug 07 2017	Joint appendix filed.
Aug 07 2017	Brief of petitioner Timothy I. Carpenter filed.
Aug 11 2017	Brief amici curiae of Data & Society Research Institute and Fifteen scholars of Technology and Society filed.
Aug 11 2017	Brief amici curiae of Competitive Enterprise Institute, et al. filed.
Aug 14 2017	Brief amici curiae of Technology Companies in support of neither party filed.
Aug 14 2017	Brief amicus curiae of Center for Democracy and Technology filed.
Aug 14 2017	Brief amici curiae of Electronic Privacy Information Center, et al. filed.
Aug 14 2017	Brief amicus curiae of The Rutherford Institute filed.
Aug 14 2017	Brief amici curiae of The Center for Competitive Politics, et al. filed.
Aug 14 2017	Brief amici curiae of Empirical Fourth Amendment Scholars filed.
Aug 14 2017	Brief amici curiae of Scholars of the History and Original Meaning of the Fourth Amendment filed.
Aug 14 2017	Brief amici curiae of The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, et al. filed.
Aug 14 2017	Brief amicus curiae of Restore the Fourth, Inc. filed.
Aug 14 2017	Brief amici curiae of Institute for Justice, et al. filed.
Aug 14 2017	Brief amici curiae of Electronic Frontier Foundation, et al. filed.
Aug 14 2017	Brief amici curiae of Scholars of Criminal Procedure and Privacy filed.
Aug 14 2017	Brief amici curiae of United States Justice Foundation, et al. filed.
Aug 14 2017	Brief amici curiae of Technology Experts filed.
Sep 25 2017	Brief of respondent United States filed.
Sep 29 2017	Brief amicus curiae of Michael Varco filed.
Oct 02 2017	Motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis granted by the Court
Oct 02 2017	Motion to appoint counsel filed by petitioner GRANTED and Harold Gurewitz, Esquire, of Detroit, Michigan, is appointed to serve as counsel for the petitioner in this case.
Oct 02 2017	Brief amici curiae of Alabama, et al. filed.
Oct 02 2017	Brief amicus curiae of Professor Orin S. Kerr filed.
Oct 02 2017	Brief amicus curiae of National District Attorneys Association filed.
Oct 06 2017	SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Wednesday, November 29, 2017
Oct 12 2017	CIRCULATED
Oct 18 2017	Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 6th Circuit.
Oct 23 2017	Record received from the U.S.C.A. 6th Circuit is electronic.
Oct 24 2017	Reply of petitioner Timothy I. Carpenter filed. (Distributed)
Nov 29 2017	Argued. For petitioner: Nathan F. Wessler, New York, N. Y. For respondent: Michael R. Dreeben, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.
Jun 22 2018	Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Roberts, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Kennedy, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Thomas and Alito, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion. Alito, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Thomas, J., joined. Gorsuch, J., filed a dissenting opinion.
Jul 24 2018	JUDGMENT ISSUED.

Tweets by @SCOTUSblog Follow 12,008 644,924

Retweet on Twitter SCOTUSblog Retweeted

; Amy Howe @AHoweBlogger ·

15h 1576324704956211200

And then there were four. (Photo from before yesterday's investiture of Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, by the Supreme Court of the United States.)

Reply on Twitter 1576324704956211200 Retweet on Twitter 1576324704956211200 125 Like on Twitter 1576324704956211200 1204 View on Twitter 1576324704956211200

; SCOTUSblog @SCOTUSblog ·

30 Sep 1575960122492604418

Art Lien, AKA @Courtartist, retired over the summer after 45 years drawing the Supreme Court. For the last nine of those years, Art worked for SCOTUSblog. We're honoring his journalism with a retrospective on his work. Trust us, it's a feast for the eyes:

Forty-five years of visual journalism from a supremely talented court artist - SCOTUSblog

For 45 years, Arthur Lien witnessed, sketched, and recorded for posterity some of the Supreme Court's most historic ...

www.scotusblog.com

Reply on Twitter 1575960122492604418 Retweet on Twitter 1575960122492604418 127 Like on Twitter 1575960122492604418 555 View on Twitter 1575960122492604418

; SCOTUSblog @SCOTUSblog ·

30 Sep 1575863277632065542

Justice Jackson's investiture ceremony has concluded. After the ceremony, she took the traditional walk down the court's front steps, accompanied by the chief justice. She also shared a moment with her husband, Patrick, on the plaza after the ceremony. Photos by @katieleebarlow.

SCOTUSblog @SCOTUSblog

Today at SCOTUS: The investiture of Ketanji Brown Jackson, the first Black woman to serve as a justice. Jackson was sworn in over the summer, so the investiture is purely ceremonial. Joe Biden and Kamala Harris reportedly are expected to attend the invite-only event at the court.

Reply on Twitter 1575863277632065542 Retweet on Twitter 1575863277632065542 187 Like on Twitter 1575863277632065542 892 View on Twitter 1575863277632065542

; SCOTUSblog @SCOTUSblog ·

30 Sep 1575824137175453696

Reply on Twitter 1575824137175453696 Retweet on Twitter 1575824137175453696 194 Like on Twitter 1575824137175453696 1064 View on Twitter 1575824137175453696

; SCOTUSblog @SCOTUSblog ·

28 Sep 1575217988655284226

JUST IN: The Supreme Court will continue to provide a live audio stream of oral arguments in the new term that begins on Monday. https://www.supremecourt.gov/publicinfo/press/pressreleases/pr_09-28-22

Reply on Twitter 1575217988655284226 Retweet on Twitter 1575217988655284226 176 Like on Twitter 1575217988655284226 636 View on Twitter 1575217988655284226

; SCOTUSblog @SCOTUSblog ·

28 Sep 1575195645723676672

SCOTUS releases new "circuit justice" lineup, with Jackson taking over the Boston-based 1st Circuit (formerly handled by Breyer). Each justice reviews emergency appeals from the regions covered by his or her circuits. (Controversial cases usually get referred to the full court.)

Reply on Twitter 1575195645723676672 Retweet on Twitter 1575195645723676672 110 Like on Twitter 1575195645723676672 278 View on Twitter 1575195645723676672

Breaking News

Carpenter v. United States

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Forty-five years of visual journalism from a supremely talented court artist

EPA’s authority over wetlands is at stake as justices wade back into regulatory morass

At Jackson’s investiture, the courtroom brims with politicians as the justices find their new seats

Live audio of oral arguments will continue as court partially reopens to public