|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-913||6th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Issue: Whether a police officer may reasonably rely on a narrow exception to a specific and clearly established right to shield him from civil liability when his conduct far exceeds the limits of that exception.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jan 11 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 14, 2019)|
|Feb 14 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 14, 2019 to March 18, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Feb 19 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 18, 2019.|
|Mar 18 2019||Motion of Deputy James Dawson, et al. for an extension of time not accepted for filing. (March 19, 2019 -- Corrected version submitted)|
|Mar 18 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 18, 2019 to April 17, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Mar 21 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 17, 2019.|
|Apr 17 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 17, 2019 to April 24, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Apr 19 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 24, 2019.|
|May 14 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2019.|
|May 22 2019||Response Requested. (Due June 21, 2019)|
|Jul 08 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 21, 2019 to July 26, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jul 12 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 26, 2019.|
|Sep 05 2019||Motion of Deputy James Dawson, et al. for an extension of time not accepted for filing. (September 10, 2019)|
|Sep 11 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 26, 2019 to September 25, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Sep 13 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including September 25, 2019.|
|Sep 13 2019||Brief of respondent Deputy James Dawson in opposition filed.|
|Oct 01 2019||Reply of petitioner Joshua Brennan filed.|
|Oct 02 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2019.|
|Oct 15 2019||Rescheduled.|
|Nov 26 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/13/2019.|
|Dec 11 2019||Rescheduled.|
|Jan 06 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.|
|Jan 08 2020||Rescheduled.|
|Apr 28 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.|
|May 13 2020||Rescheduled.|
|May 18 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2020.|
|May 22 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/28/2020.|
|Jun 01 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.|
|Jun 08 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/11/2020.|
|Jun 15 2020||Petition DENIED.|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.