|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|17-333||D. Md.||Mar 28, 2018||Jun 18, 2018||N/A||Per Curiam||OT 2017|
Holding: Because the balance of equities and the public interest tilt against the preliminary injunction motion of plaintiffs claiming that a Maryland congressional district was gerrymandered to retaliate against them for their political views, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion.
Judgment: Affirmed in a per curiam opinion on June 18, 2018.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Sep 01 2017||Statement as to jurisdiction filed. (Response due October 2, 2017)|
|Sep 01 2017||Motion to expedite consideration of the jurisdictional statement filed by appellants.|
|Sep 11 2017||Response in opposition to motion to expedite consideration of the jurisdictional statement from appellees filed.|
|Sep 12 2017||Reply to response in opposition to motion to expedite consideration of the jurisdictional statement from appellants filed.|
|Sep 13 2017||Motion to expedite consideration filed by appellants DENIED.|
|Sep 14 2017||Order extending time to file response to the jurisdictional statement to and including October 31, 2017.|
|Oct 31 2017||Motion to affirm filed by appellees Linda H. Lamone, et al.|
|Nov 13 2017||Opposition to motion of appellants O. John Benisek, et al. filed.|
|Nov 14 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2017.|
|Dec 04 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2017.|
|Dec 08 2017||Further consideration of the question of jurisdiction is POSTPONED to the hearing of the case on the merits.|
|Dec 26 2017||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, O. John Benisek, et al.|
|Jan 05 2018||Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Linda H. Lamone, et al.|
|Jan 22 2018||Brief of appellants O. John Benisek, et al. filed.|
|Jan 22 2018||Joint appendix filed (4 volumes). (Statement of cost filed.)|
|Jan 24 2018||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Wednesday, March 28, 2018|
|Jan 25 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Common Cause filed.|
|Jan 29 2018||Brief amici curiae of Bipartisan Current and Former Members of Congress filed.|
|Jan 29 2018||Brief amici curiae of International Municipal Lawyers Association, National League of Cities, U.S. Conference of Mayors, International City/County Management Association, and the County of Santa Clara filed.|
|Jan 29 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Professor Michael Kang filed.|
|Jan 29 2018||Brief amici curiae of Campaign Legal Center and Southern Coalition for Social Justice in Support of Neither Party filed.|
|Jan 29 2018||Brief amici curiae of Judicial Watch, Inc. and Allied Educational Foundation in support of neither party filed.|
|Jan 29 2018||Brief amicus curiae of The Brennan Center for Justice at N.Y.U. School of Law filed.|
|Jan 29 2018||Brief amici curiae of National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, et al. in support of neither party filed.|
|Jan 29 2018||Brief amici curiae of Governors Lawrence Joseph Hogan Jr., Arnold A. Schwarzenegger, Joseph Graham "Gray" Davis Jr., and John R. Kasich filed.|
|Jan 29 2018||Brief amici curiae of American Civil Liberties Union, et al. filed.|
|Jan 29 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Stephen M. Shapiro filed.|
|Feb 07 2018||CIRCULATED|
|Feb 21 2018||Record requested from the U.S.D.C Dist. of Maryland.|
|Feb 21 2018||Brief of appellees Linda H. Lamone, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 27 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Senator Joseph B. Scarnati, III filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 28 2018||Brief amicus curiae of State of Wisconsin filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 28 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Freedom Partners Chamber of Commerce filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 28 2018||Brief amicus curiae of States of Michigan, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 13 2018||Reply of appellants O. John Benisek, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 28 2018||Argued. For appellants: Michael B. Kimberly, Washington, D. C. For appellees: Steven M. Sullivan, Solicitor General, Baltimore, Md.|
|Jun 18 2018||Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Opinion per curiam.|
|Jul 20 2018||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
We're so excited about our April 15 Live Webinar (w/ @HarvardACS & @HarvardFedSoc), Covering the Court, featuring an all-star lineup of panelists @jduffyrice, @katieleebarlow, @whignewtons, & @stevenmazie! _👩⚖️👩⚖️👩⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️_ Register here ➡️ https://harvard.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_k_b_9IPBQ_GV37rpsjF9kw
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.