Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14-10186 | 4th Cir. | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | OT 2015 |
Issue: Whether the Fourth Circuit erred in affirming the denial of relief on the inmate petitioner's complaint alleging that the prison discriminated against him in violation of the First Amendment and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act by refusing to permit him to organize a Jewish Bible study group.
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
Jun 11 2015 | Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 13, 2015) |
Jul 30 2015 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 28, 2015. |
Sep 8 2015 | Response Requested . (Due October 8, 2015) |
Sep 25 2015 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including November 9, 2015. |
Nov 5 2015 | Brief of respondent Betty Brown in opposition filed. |
Nov 24 2015 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 11, 2015. |
Dec 28 2015 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 8, 2016. |
Jan 11 2016 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 15, 2016. |
Jan 19 2016 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 22, 2016. |
Feb 8 2016 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 19, 2016. |
Feb 16 2016 | Reply of petitioner Israel Ben-Levi, aka Danny L. Loren filed. (Distributed) |
Feb 29 2016 | Petition DENIED Justice Alito, dissenting from the denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion) |
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. Weβre still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
www.scotusblog.com
We're so excited about our April 15 Live Webinar (w/ @HarvardACS & @HarvardFedSoc), Covering the Court, featuring an all-star lineup of panelists @jduffyrice, @katieleebarlow, @whignewtons, & @stevenmazie! _π©ββοΈπ©ββοΈπ©ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈ_ Register here β‘οΈ https://harvard.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_k_b_9IPBQ_GV37rpsjF9kw
Senator Markey (D-Ma) is delivering remarks right now in front of the Supreme Court introducing the Judiciary Act of 2021 to expand the court to 13 justices. Heβs flanked by Chairman of House Judiciary, Jerry Nadler (D-NY), and Hank Johnson (D-Ga).
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here:
Cast your vote below!
The “great chief” and the “super chief”: A final showdown in Supreme Court March Madness - SCOTUSblog
Forget Ali vs. Frazier, Celtics vs. Lakers, or Evert vs. Navratilova. It’s time for Marshall vs. Warren. After...
www.scotusblog.com
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.