Bank of America, N.A. v. Lusnak
Petition for certiorari denied on November 19, 2018
Issue: (1) Whether the National Bank Act pre-empts state laws regulating national-bank loan terms, such as California"s law requiring payment of interest on mortgage-loan escrow accounts; and (2) whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit erred in disregarding regulations from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the primary regulator of national banks, concerning the applicability of state real-estate lending laws to national banks.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petitions of the week (Aurora Barnes, September 12, 2018)
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 08/14/2018 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 17, 2018) |
| 08/16/2018 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 17, 2018 to October 17, 2018, submitted to The Clerk. |
| 08/21/2018 | Blanket Consent filed by Respondent. |
| 08/24/2018 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 17, 2018. |
| 09/17/2018 | Brief amici curiae of The Bank Policy Institute, et al. filed. |
| 10/17/2018 | Brief of respondent Donald Lusnak in opposition filed. |
| 10/31/2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/16/2018. |
| 10/31/2018 | Reply of petitioner Bank of America, N.A. filed. (Distributed) |
| 11/19/2018 | Petition DENIED. |