Bank of America Corporation v. Fund Liquidation Holdings LLC
Petition for certiorari denied on January 10, 2022
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to SCOTUSblog in various capacities, is counsel to the respondents in this case.
Issue: Whether a district court lacking Article III
jurisdiction can create such jurisdiction by adding a
new plaintiff via Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) |
|---|
| Oct 01 2021 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 4, 2021) |
| Oct 26 2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 4, 2021 to December 10, 2021, submitted to The Clerk. |
| Oct 27 2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted in part and the time is extended to and including December 8, 2021. |
| Nov 04 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed. |
| Nov 04 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed. |
| Dec 07 2021 | Brief of respondents Fund Liquidation Holdings LLC, as assignee and successor-in-interest to FrontPoint Asian Event Driven Fund L.P., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Sonterra Capital Master Fund, Ltd., et al. in opposition filed. |
| Dec 22 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022. |
| Dec 22 2021 | Reply of petitioners Bank of America Corp., et al. filed. (Distributed) |
| Jan 10 2022 | Petition DENIED. |
