|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|14-15||9th Cir.||Jan 20, 2015||Mar 31, 2015||5-4||Scalia||OT 2014|
Holding: Medicaid providers do not have a cause of action to challenge a state’s reimbursement rates.
Judgment: Reversed, 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Scalia on March 31, 2015. Chief Justice Roberts, and Justices Thomas, Breyer, and Alito join the opinion as to Parts I, II, and III. Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Thomas and Alito also join as to Part IV. Justice Breyer filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgement. Justice Sotomayor filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Kennedy, Ginsburg, and Kagan joined.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jul 2 2014||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 6, 2014)|
|Jul 29 2014||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including September 5, 2014.|
|Aug 6 2014||Brief amici curiae of Texas, et al. filed.|
|Aug 27 2014||Brief of respondents Exceptional Child Center, Inc., et al. in opposition filed.|
|Sep 9 2014||Reply of petitioners Richard Armstrong, et al. filed.|
|Sep 10 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 29, 2014.|
|Oct 2 2014||Petition GRANTED limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.|
|Nov 17 2014||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|Nov 17 2014||Brief of petitioners Richard Armstrong, et al. filed.|
|Nov 17 2014||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners.|
|Nov 19 2014||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondents.|
|Nov 21 2014||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, January 20, 2015|
|Nov 24 2014||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.|
|Nov 24 2014||Brief amici curiae of Texas, et al. filed.|
|Nov 24 2014||Brief amici curiae of National Governors Association, et al. filed.|
|Nov 24 2014||Brief amicus curiae of California Health and Human Services Agency filed.|
|Dec 2 2014||Record requested from U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.|
|Dec 2 2014||Record requested from U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER.|
|Dec 2 2014||Record from U.S.D.C. District of Idaho is electronic and located on PACER.|
|Dec 12 2014||CIRCULATED.|
|Dec 17 2014||Brief of respondents Exceptional Child Center, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 18 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Medicaid Defense Fund filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 19 2014||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Dec 22 2014||Brief amici curiae of National Health Law Program, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 22 2014||Brief amici curiae of American Civil Liberties Union, et al., filed. Distributed.|
|Dec 23 2014||Brief amici curiae of The American Network of Community Options and Resources, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 23 2014||Brief amici curiae of The American Hospital Association, and Federation of American Hospitals filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 23 2014||Brief amici curiae of Former HHS Officials filed. (Distributed).|
|Dec 23 2014||Brief amici curiae of American Medical Association, et al., filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 23 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 24 2014||Brief amici curiae of Members of Congress filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 24 2014||Brief amici curiae of American Association of People with Disabilities, et al., filed. (Distributed).|
|Dec 24 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 9 2015||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Jan 13 2015||Reply of petitioners Richard Armstrong, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 20 2015||Argued. For petitioners: Carl J. Withroe, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, Idaho; and Edwin S. Kneedler, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondents: James M. Piotrowski, Boise, Idaho.|
|Mar 31 2015||Judgment REVERSED. Scalia, J., delivered the opinion of the Court with respect to Parts I, II, and III, in which Roberts, C. J., and Thomas, Breyer, and Alito, JJ., joined, and an opinion with respect to Part IV, in which Roberts, C. J., and Thomas and Alito, JJ., joined. Breyer, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. Sotomayor, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Kennedy, Ginsburg, and Kagan, JJ., joined.|
|May 4 2015||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
As a lawyer, Leondra Kruger argued 12 cases at the U.S. Supreme Court. As a California Supreme Court justice, she has a liberal-leaning record but has sometimes voted with more conservative colleagues in divided cases. Here's @AHoweBlogger's profile:
Profile of a potential nominee: Leondra Kruger - SCOTUSblog
During a 2020 Democratic presidential primary debate, then-candidate Joe Biden pledged that, if elected, he would nomi...
Two candidates to replace Breyer stand apart: Leondra Kruger and Ketanji Brown Jackson. Kruger is six years younger. Jackson recently underwent a Senate confirmation. And the role of Ron Klain, Biden's chief of staff, may be pivotal.
How Biden will choose the next Supreme Court nominee - SCOTUSblog
With today’s reporting that Justice Stephen Breyer intends to retire, we now kick off our analysis of potentia...
Stephen Breyer wrote major opinions favoring abortion rights, demarcating the separation of powers, and rejecting a challenge to Obamacare. In his later years, he questioned the constitutionality of the death penalty. Our retrospective, via @AHoweBlogger:
Stephen Breyer, pragmatic liberal, will retire at end of term - SCOTUSblog
Justice Stephen Breyer, a devoted pragmatist and the senior member of the Supreme Court’s liberal wing, will r...
BREAKING: Per @PeteWilliamsNBC of @NBCNews, Justice Stephen Breyer is retiring. The 83-year-old Breyer, a pragmatic liberal who has served on the Supreme Court for nearly 28 years, is expected to tell the White House imminently of his intention to step down.
NEWS: Supreme Court Justice Breyer to retire, @PeteWilliamsNBC reporting live on @NBCNews Special Report
A rule that allows SCOTUS to hear cases before appeals courts weigh in used to be very rare. But in the past three years, it's become far more common. And the justices haven't said why.
@steve_vladeck explains the resurgent writ of "cert before judgment."
The rise of certiorari before judgment - SCOTUSblog
For obvious reasons, the Supreme Court’s decision on Monday to grant certiorari in a pair of cases challenging...
Sonia Sotomayor appeared this morning on @TODAYshow to promote her new children's book, "Just Help!: How to Build a Better World." She spoke briefly about the public's perception of the court. Here's the interview: https://www.today.com/video/justice-sotomayor-on-new-book-supreme-court-s-credibility-loss-of-her-mother-131639365722