|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
Issue: Whether an alien who is detained under 8 U.S.C. § 1231 is entitled by statute, after six months of detention, to a bond hearing at which the government must prove to an immigration judge by clear and convincing evidence that the alien is a flight risk or a danger to the community.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Nov 08 2019||Application (19A515) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 18, 2019 to December 18, 2019, submitted to Justice Alito.|
|Nov 12 2019||Application (19A515) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until December 18, 2019.|
|Dec 06 2019||Application (19A515) to extend further the time from December 18, 2019 to January 17, 2020, submitted to Justice Alito.|
|Dec 10 2019||Application (19A515) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until January 17, 2020.|
|Jan 17 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 20, 2020)|
|Jan 17 2020||Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and shouild not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.|
|Feb 13 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 20, 2020 to March 23, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Feb 14 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 23, 2020.|
|Mar 06 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 23, 2020 to April 22, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Mar 06 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 22, 2020.|
|Apr 22 2020||Brief of respondent Antonio Arteaga-Martinez in opposition filed.|
|May 08 2020||Motion of petitioner to delay distribution of the petition for a writ of certiorari under Rule 15.5 from May 12, 2020 to May 19, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|May 08 2020||Motion to delay distribution of the petition for a writ certiorari until May 19, 2020, granted.|
|May 14 2020||Reply of petitioners Matthew T. Albence, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|May 19 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.|
|Jun 08 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/11/2020.|
|Jul 01 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/1/2021.|
Having covered the Supreme Court for six decades, @lylden has seen a lot of changes at 1 First Street. In the latest piece in our series on the post-COVID court, Lyle examines how the court's pandemic operations could spur permanent reform.
How has COVID-19 changed the Supreme Court? And are any of those changes worth keeping? Today we launch a symposium examining those questions.
First up, a piece from @stevenmazie on how to reform oral arguments after the pandemic.
The court after COVID: A recipe for oral argument reform - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court has not yet announced whether it will return to normal operations when the 2021-22 term begins ...
NEW shadow-docket case: New York landlords ask SCOTUS for an emergency order to prevent the state from continuing to enforce its COVID-related eviction moratorium. They say the moratorium "runs roughshod" over their constitutional rights.
Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A8-1.pdf
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.