This article is part of a symposium on the court’s decision in Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee. David H. Gans is the director of the Human Rights, Civil Rights & Citizenship Program at the Constitutional Accountability Center.
David H. Gans is the director of the Human Rights, Civil Rights & Citizenship Program at the Constitutional Accountability Center, which filed an amicus brief for current and former members of Congress in support of the challengers in Gill v. Whitford and Benisek v. Lamone.
David H. Gans is the Director of the Human Rights, Civil Rights & Citizenship Program at the Constitutional Accountability Center.
Clearly we have touched a nerve. Among the more than seventy amicus briefs filed on behalf of UT-Austin in Fisher, the argument made by the Constitutional Accountability Center’s brief (signed by both of us, along with preeminent constitutional scholars including Jack Balkin, Bruce Ackerman, and Burt Neuborne) has sparked considerable commentary among conservative proponents of originalism.
This contribution to our symposium on Fisher v. University of Texas comes from David Gans and Adam Winkler. David Gans is the Director of the Human Rights, Civil Rights and Citizenship Program at the Constitutional Accountability Center and co-author of CAC’s brief in Fisher.
David H. Gans is the Director of the Human Rights, Civil Rights, and Citizenship Program at the Constitutional Accountability Center, which filed an amicus brief supporting the petitioner in McDonald v. Chicago Today’s opinion in McDonald v. City of Chicago is a momentous development in American law.