Every post published in November 2011, most recent first.
This morning the Justices will hear oral argument in two cases. First up is the argument in Setser v. United States, which Michael Dimino previewed for the blog. The second argument this morning is Federal Aviation Administration v. Cooper, which Alex Wohl previewed for us.
The Court heard oral argument in two cases yesterday. In Credit Suisse Securities v. Simmonds the Court is considering whether the deadline to file certain insider trading claims is delayed until the insider discloses the trades in reports to the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The Supreme Court hears arguments next week in its first patent case of the year, Caraco Pharmaceutical Labs v. Novo Nordisk. Like last Term’s Pliva, Inc. v. Mensing, this case presents the Court with one of the many places in which generic and branded pharmaceuticals face off at the FDA.
Today in the Community we return to Arizona v. United States, which we have previously discussed in the Community; several experts also weighed in on the case during our symposium this summer. On December 9, the Justices will consider the petition during their private Conference.
The Justices considered a classic puzzle in statutory construction this week when they heard arguments in Hall v. United States.
Transcripts from today’s arguments in Setser v. United States and Federal Aviation Administration v. Cooper are available here and here.
Yesterday the Court heard oral argument in Credit Suisse Securities v. Simmonds and considered whether the limitations period for Section 16(b) insider trading claims under the Exchange Act of 1934 is ever subject to tolling and, if so, for how long.
On December 5, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a Fourth Amendment case, Messerschmidt v. Millender, that concerns the particularity of search warrants and the qualified immunity standard. (Michael Smith previewed the case yesterday for this blog.)
This morning the Justices will hear oral argument in two cases. Ronald Mann previewed the first case, Hall v. United States, for the blog, Steve Kaufhold previewed the second case, Credit Suisse Securities v. Simmonds.
Yesterday the Court heard oral argument in two cases, First American Financial Corp. v. Edwards and Mims v. Arrow Financial Services. In First American Financial, the Court is considering whether a homebuyer has standing to sue banks and title companies that pay kickbacks for closing services associated with a mortgage loan, even if the kickbacks did not affect the price or quality of the mortgage services.