Skip to content

Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. v. Noohi

Pending petition

Docket No. Op. BelowArgument Opinion Vote Author Term
25-874 9th Cir. TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

Issue: Whether expert testimony must be admissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and the framework enunciated in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., to justify certifying a class under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
11/12/2025Application (25A565) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 2, 2025 to January 16, 2026, submitted to Justice Kagan.
11/14/2025Application (25A565) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until January 16, 2026.
01/16/2026Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 23, 2026)
01/23/2026Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 23, 2026 to March 25, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
01/27/2026Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 25, 2026.
02/13/2026Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of The United States of America, et al. filed.
03/11/2026Brief of respondent Narguess Noohi, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated in opposition filed.
03/24/2026Reply of petitioner Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. filed. (Distributed)
03/25/2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2026.