Lyft, Inc. v. California
Petition for certiorari denied on October 7, 2024
| Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23-1132 | Cal. Ct. App. | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | OT 2024 |
Issue: Whether the Federal Arbitration Act preempts state law authorizing public officials to pursue claims for individualized monetary relief in court for the benefit of individuals who agreed to resolve those claims in arbitration, thereby circumventing those individuals" arbitration agreements.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Colorado man argues last-minute switch in public defenders is unconstitutional (Kalvis Golde, August 1, 2024)
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 04/16/2024 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 20, 2024) |
| 05/08/2024 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 20, 2024 to June 19, 2024, submitted to The Clerk. |
| 05/09/2024 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 20, 2024, for all respondents. See Rule 30.1. |
| 05/20/2024 | Brief amici curiae of Retail Litigation Center, Inc., et al. filed. VIDED. |
| 05/20/2024 | Brief amicus curiae of Professor George A. Bermann filed. VIDED. |
| 06/20/2024 | Brief of respondents California, et al. in opposition filed. VIDED. |
| 07/10/2024 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024. |
| 07/10/2024 | Reply of petitioner Lyft, Inc. filed. (Distributed) |
| 10/07/2024 | Petition DENIED. |