Skip to content

Crandel v. Hall

Petition for certiorari denied on February 20, 2024

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
23-317 5th Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2023

Issue: Whether the objective-reasonableness test of Kingsley v. Hendrickson applies to pretrial detainees" claims about their treatment while in custody, including failure to protect from the risk of suicide.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
09/22/2023Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 27, 2023)
09/28/2023Waiver of right of respondents Vegas Hastings and Daniel Piper to respond filed.
09/29/2023Waiver of right of respondents Oscar Borrego, Sr., Oscar E. Carrillo, and Peter E. Melendez to respond filed.
10/03/2023Waiver of right of respondents Dalena Hall and Cari Renea McGowen to respond filed.
10/24/2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2023.
10/27/2023Response Requested. (Due November 27, 2023)
11/07/2023Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 27, 2023 to January 11, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
11/08/2023Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 11, 2024, for all respondents.
01/09/2024Brief amicus curiae of National Sheriffs' Association filed.
01/11/2024Brief of respondents Vegas Hastings and Daniel Piper in opposition filed.
01/11/2024Brief of respondents Oscar Borrego, Sr., Oscar E. Carrillo, and Peter E. Melendez in opposition filed.
01/11/2024Brief of respondents Dalena Hall and Cari Renea McGowen in opposition filed.
01/25/2024Reply of petitioners Otis Crandel, as Dependent Administrator of and on Behalf of Billy Wayne Worl, Jr., et al. filed.
01/31/2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
02/20/2024Petition DENIED.