Handy Technologies, Inc. v. Pote
Petition for a writ of certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana.
| Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21-1121 | Cal. Ct. App. | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | OT 2021 |
Issue: Whether the Federal Arbitration Act requires enforcement of a bilateral arbitration agreement providing that an employee cannot raise representative claims, including under the California Private Attorneys General Act.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 02/04/2022 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 16, 2022) |
| 02/25/2022 | Waiver of right of respondent Patrick Pote to respond filed. |
| 03/16/2022 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2022. |
| 03/18/2022 | Response Requested. (Due April 18, 2022) |
| 04/15/2022 | Brief of respondent Patrick Pote filed. |
| 05/03/2022 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/19/2022. |
| 06/21/2022 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/23/2022. |
| 06/27/2022 | Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana, 596 U. S. ___ (2022). |
| 07/29/2022 | JUDGMENT ISSUED |