Crow v. Fontenot
Petition for certiorari denied on June 6, 2022
Issue: Whether "new" evidence, as referred to in Schlup v. Delo and McQuiggin v. Perkins, means evidence that was not available at the time of trial or, under the broad reading adopted below, encompasses any evidence, including evidence known by the defendant and/or available with due diligence, not presented at trial.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Suing the International Finance Corporation, and Chicago polices destroy-or-sell policy (Andrew Hamm, January 21, 2022)
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 01/03/2022 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 7, 2022) |
| 01/24/2022 | Waiver of right of respondent Karl Fontenot to respond filed. |
| 01/26/2022 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022. |
| 02/01/2022 | Response Requested. (Due March 3, 2022) |
| 02/16/2022 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 3, 2022 to May 2, 2022, submitted to The Clerk. |
| 02/17/2022 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 2, 2022. |
| 05/02/2022 | Brief of respondent Karl Fontenot in opposition filed. |
| 05/11/2022 | Reply of petitioner Scott Crow filed. |
| 05/17/2022 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/2/2022. |
| 06/06/2022 | Petition DENIED. |