Skip to content

Baker v. Rose

Petition for certiorari denied on October 5, 2020

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
19-1255 9th Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2020

Issue: Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit"s decision " reversing a federal district court"s denial of habeas relief in a decision that sounds of ordinary error correction instead of applying the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, after the state trial court rejected both the defendant"s and the state"s attempts to introduce evidence of uncharged acts and prior acquittals " violates the AEDPA, given that the Supreme Court reversed the 9th Circuit under materially indistinguishable circumstances in Nevada v. Jackson.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
02/14/2020Application (19A915) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 24, 2020 to March 25, 2020, submitted to Justice Kagan.
02/20/2020Application (19A915) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until March 25, 2020.
04/24/2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 1, 2020)
05/27/2020Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 1, 2020 to July 1, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
05/29/2020Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 1, 2020.
07/01/2020Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Jeff N. Rose.
07/01/2020Brief of respondent Jeff N. Rose in opposition filed.
07/14/2020Reply of petitioners Renee Baker, et al. filed. (Distributed)
07/15/2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
10/05/2020Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
10/05/2020Petition DENIED.