Iancu v. Brunetti
Docket No. | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
18-302 | Apr 15, 2019 | Jun 24, 2019 | 6-3 | Kagan | OT 2018 |
Holding: The Lanham Act prohibition on the registration of "immoral" or "scandalous" trademarks infringes the First Amendment.
Judgment: Affirmed, 6-3, in an opinion by Justice Kagan on June 24, 2019. Justice Alito filed a concurring opinion. Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Breyer filed opinions concurring in part and dissenting in part. Justice Sotomayor filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, in which Justice Breyer joined.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- From 12 to 8: Final countdown at the Supreme Court (SCOTUStalk, June 25, 2019)
- A "view" from the courtroom: From the T-shirt shop to the high seas (Mark Walsh, June 24, 2019)
- Opinion analysis: Long-time prohibition on registration of scandalous and immoral trademarks is struck down (Megan Carpenter, June 24, 2019)
- A trademark case with colorful language: Amy Howe and Mark Walsh talk through Iancu v. Brunetti (SCOTUStalk, April 22, 2019)
- Argument analysis: Justices grapple with immoral and scandalous trademarks (Megan Carpenter, April 16, 2019)
- A view from the courtroom: Dangling past participles (Mark Walsh, April 15, 2019)
- Argument preview: Justices to consider constitutionality of banning trademark registration for immoral and scandalous marks (Megan Carpenter, April 8, 2019)
- More on todays orders (Amy Howe, January 4, 2019)
- Petitions of the week (Aurora Barnes, October 4, 2018)