Lockwood, Andrews & Newman, P.C. v. Mason
Petition for certiorari denied on June 22, 2017
Issue: (1) Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit correctly held " in conflict with the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the 5th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 10th and 11th Circuits " that a plaintiff seeking the remand of a class action, in which class membership is not limited to forum-state citizens, need not present any evidence that greater than two thirds of proposed class members are such citizens; and (2) whether the 6th Circuit correctly held " consistent with the 9th Circuit, but in conflict with the 5th, 10th and 11th Circuits " that a plaintiff seeking remand has adequately pled that a particular defendant's conduct forms a "significant basis" of the class's claims when it has made only undifferentiated and conclusory allegations regarding the conduct of multiple defendants.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petition of the day (Aurora Barnes, May 18, 2017)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
01/13/2017 | Application (16A701) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 14, 2017 to March 16, 2017, submitted to Justice Kagan. |
01/18/2017 | Application (16A701) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until March 16, 2017. |
03/09/2017 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 10, 2017) |
04/06/2017 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including May 10, 2017. |
05/08/2017 | Brief of respondents Jennifer Mason, et al. in opposition filed. |
05/22/2017 | Reply of petitioners Lockwood, Andrews & Newman, P.C., et al. filed. |
05/23/2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 8, 2017. |
06/12/2017 | Petition DENIED. |