Musnuff v. Haeger

Case dismissed, pursuant to Rule 46, on October 25, 0016

Docket No.	Op. Below	Argument	Opinion	Vote	Author	Term
15-1491	9th Cir.	TBD	TBD	TBD	TBD	OT 2016

Issue: Whether a federal court is required to tailor compensatory civil sanctions imposed under inherent powers to harm directly caused by sanctionable misconduct when the court does not afford sanctioned parties the protections of criminal due process.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Justices add eight new cases to docket for upcoming term (Amy Howe, September 29, 2016)

Date	Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
04/28/2016	Application (15A1124) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 16, 2016 to June 7, 2016, submitted to Justice Kennedy.
05/04/2016	Application (15A1124) granted by Justice Kennedy extending the time to file until June 7, 2016.
06/07/2016	Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 11, 2016)
06/16/2016	Waiver of right of respondents Graeme Hancok & Fennemore Craig, P. C. to respond filed.
07/11/2016	Brief of respondents Leroy Haeger, et al. in opposition filed.
07/27/2016	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 26, 2016.
07/27/2016	Reply of petitioner Basil J. Musnuff filed. (Distributed)
09/29/2016	Petition GRANTED limited to Question 1 presented by the petition. The petition for a writ of certiorari in No. 15-1406 is granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition. The cases are consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.
10/17/2016	Stipulation to dismiss the petition for a writ of certiorari pursuant to Rule 46 received.
10/25/2016	Petition Dismissed - Rule 46.