Government of Belize v. BCB Holdings Limited
Petition for certiorari denied on January 9, 2017
Issue: (1) Whether, under the doctrine of forum non conveniens, as applied to a confirmation action to enforce a foreign arbitral award, a foreign forum is per se inadequate because assets in the United States cannot be attached by a foreign court, as the D.C. Circuit has held; or whether forum non conveniens remains a viable doctrine in foreign arbitration confirmation actions if the foreign forum has jurisdiction and there are some assets of the defendant available in the alternative forum, as the Second Circuit held; and (2) whether, under Article V(2)(b) of the New York Convention, public policy in favor of arbitration yields where confirmation of an arbitral award would be contrary to countervailing public policies such as constitutional separation of powers principles, combating government corruption, and/or international comity.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petitions of the day (Kate Howard, August 20, 2016)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
07/26/2016 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 29, 2016) |
08/04/2016 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including September 28, 2016. |
08/29/2016 | Brief amicus curiae of Government of Guyana filed. |
09/28/2016 | Brief of respondents BCB Holdings Limited, et al. in opposition filed. |
10/12/2016 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 28, 2016. |
10/12/2016 | Reply of petitioner Government of Belize filed. (Distributed) |
10/19/2016 | Rescheduled. |
12/21/2016 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 6, 2017. |
01/09/2017 | Petition DENIED. |