Skip to content

Bondi v. Dana’s Railroad Supply

Petition for certiorari denied on April 3, 2017

Docket No. Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
15-1482 N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2016

Issue: Whether Florida's nearly thirty-year-old Surcharge Statute is a facially unconstitutional speech restriction, as the Eleventh Circuit held, or whether such a law regulates only conduct and does not even implicate the First Amendment, as the Second and Fifth Circuits have held.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
03/31/2016Application (15A1021) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 12, 2016 to June 6, 2016, submitted to Justice Thomas.
04/07/2016Application (15A1021) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until June 6, 2016.
06/06/2016Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 8, 2016)
06/17/2016Order extending time to file response to petition to and including August 8, 2016, for all respondents.
08/05/2016Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including August 15, 2016, for all respondents.
08/15/2016Brief of respondents Dana's Railroad Supply, et al. in opposition filed.
08/29/2016Reply of petitioner Pam Bondi, Attorney General of Florida filed.
08/31/2016DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 26, 2016.
03/29/2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 31, 2017.
04/03/2017Petition DENIED.