Estate of Barabin v. AstenJohnson, Inc.
Petition for certiorari denied on October 6, 2014
Issue: Whether, in a federal jury case, a district judge's procedural failure to make detailed findings under Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals regarding important expert testimony requires the appellate court to order a new trial, regardless of whether there was actually any substantive error in the expert testimony heard or not heard by the jury.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petition of the day (Maureen Johnston, August 21, 2014)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
04/15/2014 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 19, 2014) |
05/01/2014 | Waiver of right of respondent Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. to respond filed. |
05/19/2014 | Brief of respondent AstenJohnson, Inc. in opposition filed. |
06/02/2014 | Reply of petitioners Estate of Henry Barabin, et al. filed. |
06/03/2014 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 19, 2014. |
06/13/2014 | Response Requested from Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc.. (Due July 14, 2014) |
07/11/2014 | Brief of respondent Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. in opposition filed. |
07/28/2014 | Reply of petitioners Estate of Henry Barabin, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
07/30/2014 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 29, 2014. |
10/06/2014 | Petition DENIED. |