Skip to content

Grounds v. Sessoms

Petition granted, judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of Salinas v. Texas on June 27, 2013

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
12-804 9th Cir. Not Argued Jun 27, 2013 TBD TBD OT 2012

Issue: (1) Whether, when the suspect in custody makes an ambiguous or equivocal reference to counsel before receiving Miranda warnings, "clearly established Federal law" as determined by this Court forbids the police from advising the suspect of his Miranda rights and then conducting an interrogation after he waives them; and (2) whether, under the "highly deferential" standard of review set out in 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d), it was objectively unreasonable for the state court to conclude that respondent did not unambiguously and unequivocally invoke his right to counsel before receiving Miranda warnings.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
11/02/2012Application (12A464) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 14, 2012 to January 13, 2013, submitted to Justice Kennedy.
11/08/2012Application (12A464) granted by Justice Kennedy extending the time to file until December 14, 2012.
12/13/2012Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 4, 2013)
01/14/2013Waiver of right of respondent Tio Dinero Sessoms to respond filed.
01/30/2013DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 15, 2013.
01/31/2013Response Requested . (Due March 4, 2013)
02/08/2013Brief amicus curiae of California District Attorneys Association filed.
02/26/2013Order extending time to file response to petition to and including April 3, 2013.
04/02/2013Brief of respondent Tio Dinero Sessoms in opposition filed.
04/02/2013Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent.
04/16/2013Reply of petitioner Randy Grounds, Acting Warden filed.
04/23/2013DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 9, 2013.
06/17/2013DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 20, 2013.
06/25/2013DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 26, 2013.
06/27/2013Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
06/27/2013Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Salinas v. Texas, 570 U.S. ____ (2013).
07/29/2013JUDGMENT ISSUED.