Herrera v. Oregon
Petition for certiorari denied on January 10, 2010
| Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10-344 | Court of Appeals of Oregon, opinion begins on pg. 50 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | OT 2009 |
Issue: Whether the Sixth Amendment, as incorporated against the states by the Fourteenth Amendment, requires a unanimous jury verdict to convict a person of a crime.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petition of the day (Conor McEvily, October 5, 2010)
Briefs and Documents
Certiorari-stage documents
- Opinion Below (Court of Appeals of Oregon, opinion begins on pg. 50)
- Petition for certiorari
- Brief in opposition
- Amicus brief for Sheri S. Diamond, et al.
- Amicus brief for Professor Jeffrey B. Abramson
- Amicus brief for Oregon Criminal-Law and Criminal-Procedure Professors
- Amicus brief for the Federal Public Defender of the District of Oregon
- Amicus brief for Professor Kate Stith
- Amicus brief for the Louisiana Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, et al.
- Petitioner's reply
[##CERT-STAGE##]